The DOI matches its DataCite record.
Demonstration of Non-Deterministic Quantum Logic Operations using Linear Optical Elements
Abstract
Knill, Laflamme, and Milburn recently showed that non-deterministic quantum logic operations could be performed using linear optical elements, additional photons (ancilla), and post-selection based on the output of single-photon detectors [Nature 409, 46 (2001)]. Here we report the experimental demonstration of two logic devices of this kind, a destructive controlled-NOT (CNOT) gate and a quantum parity check. These two devices can be combined with a pair of entangled photons to implement a conventional (non-destructive) CNOT that succeeds with a probability of 1/4.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Two-photon, coincidence-basis gates that perform some but not all of the operations of a CNOT gate have been described.
“Two photon, coincidence basis gates, which perform some, but not all of the operations of a CNOT gate have also been described [8, 9, 10].”
From Linear optical controlled-NOT gate in the coincidence basis (2002) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 15
- E. Knill, R. Laflamme, and G.J. Milburn, Nature 409, 46 (2001).
- D. Bouwmeester, A. Ekert, and A. Zeilinger, The Physics of Quantum Information. Springer-Verlag, Berlin (2000).
- J.W. Pan, C. Simon, C. Brukner, and A. Zeilinger, Na- ture 410, 1067 (2001).
- J.W. Pan and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. A 57, 2208 (1998).
- D. Bouwmeester, J.W. Pan, M. Daniell, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 1345 (1999).
- M.O. Scully and K. Druhl, Phys. Rev. A 25, 2208 (1982).
- P.G. Kwiat, A.M.Steinberg, and R.Y. Chiao, Phys. Rev. A 45, 7729 (1992).
- Y.H. Shih and A.V. Sergienko, Phys. Lett. A 186, 29 (1994).
- M.H. Rubin, D.N. Klyshko, Y.H. Shih, and A.V. Sergienko, Phys. Rev. A 50, 5122 (1994).
- T.B. Pittman, D.V. Strekalov, A. Migdall, M.H. Rubin, A.V. Sergienko, and Y.H. Shih, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77, 1917 (1996).
- M. Zukowski, A. Zeilinger, and H. Weinfurter, Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 755, 91 (1995).
- A. Zeilinger, M.A. Horne, H. Weinfurter, and M. Zukowski, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3031 (1997).
- Z.Y. Ou, Quantum Semiclass. Opt. 9, 599 (1997).
- J.W. Pan, M. Daniell. S. Gasparoni, G. Weihs, and A. Zelinger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 4435 (2001).
- Quantum Computing and Quantum Information, M.A. Nielsen and I.L. Chuang, Cambridge University Press (2000).
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Linear optical controlled-NOT gate in the coincidence basis
Ralph, T. C., Langford, N. K., Bell, T. B., & White, A. G. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.062324 · Cited by 346
Metadata
- Authors
- Pittman, T. B., Jacobs, B. C., & Franson, J. D.
- Venue
- arXiv
- Publisher
- arXiv
- Published
- 2001
- arXiv
- quant-ph/0109128
- References
- 0
- Type
- Preprint
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
