PreprintCited by 113Cellular Automata and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systems

Reversible quantum cellular automata

Open access
Schumacher, B., Werner, R. F.·2004·arXiv

Abstract

We define quantum cellular automata as infinite quantum lattice systems with discrete time dynamics, such that the time step commutes with lattice translations and has strictly finite propagation speed. In contrast to earlier definitions this allows us to give an explicit characterization of all local rules generating such automata. The same local rules also generate the global time step for automata with periodic boundary conditions. Our main structure theorem asserts that any quantum cellular automaton is structurally reversible, i.e., that it can be obtained by applying two blockwise unitary operations in a generalized Margolus partitioning scheme. This implies that, in contrast to the classical case, the inverse of a nearest neighbor quantum cellular automaton is again a nearest neighbor automaton. We present several construction methods for quantum cellular automata, based on unitaries commuting with their translates, on the quantization of (arbitrary) reversible classical cellular automata, on quantum circuits, and on Clifford transformations with respect to a description of the single cells by finite Weyl systems. Moreover, we indicate how quantum random walks can be considered as special cases of cellular automata, namely by restricting a quantum lattice gas automaton with local particle number conservation to the single particle sector.

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0405174

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A linear field-QCA is obtained by promoting the state | ψ 〉 in the usual QW framework to a vector of field operators ψ.

    “By reversing the line of reasoning one can realize that a linear field-QCA is obtained by 'promoting' the state | ψ 〉 in the usual QW framework to a vector of field operators ψ (see the 'second quantization' of a QW of Ref. [27]).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Schumacher, B., & Werner, R. F.
Venue
arXiv
Publisher
arXiv
Published
2004
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1609371467
Cited by
113
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 8
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
Keywords
quantum cellular automata, reversibility, local rules, quantum walks, quantum circuits, periodic boundary conditions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review