Cited by 16Cellular Automata and ApplicationsQuantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum Mechanics and Applications

The quantum game of life

Open access
Arrighi, Pablo, Grattage, Jonathan·2012·Physics World

Abstract

The idea that our universe can be modelled as a giant computer dates back to the 1970s. But as Pablo Arrighi and Jonathan Grattage describe, quantum-information theorists are now hoping to revitalize this idea by making the "digital physics" project compatible with quantum theory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/2058-7058/25/06/37

Cites

44 of 44 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Quantum cellular automata have attracted great interest due to their potential in quantum computation.

    “Recently, quantum cellular automata have attracted great interest due to their potential in quantum computation [8-10]”

    From Photonic cellular automaton simulation of relativistic quantum fields: Observation of <i>Zitterbewegung</i> (2024) · cites this paper as [9]

    “Towards quantum cellular automata” describes automata built from qubits and quantum gates and discusses their computational universality. “Beyond quantum digital physics” says these concepts are likely to be important for studying a parallel quantum computer. The paper does not establish the broader claim that quantum cellular automata have attracted great interest specifically because of their potential in quantum computation; its focus is on models of physical phenomena. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Arrighi, P., & Grattage, J.
Affiliations
  • Laboratoire d'Informatique de Grenoble (FR)
  • Laboratoire de l'Informatique du Parallélisme (FR)
Venue
Physics World
Published
2012-06
Volume
25
Issue
06
Pages
23-26
ISSN
  • 0953-8585 (ISSN-L)
  • 2058-7058
OpenAlex
W1510036950
Cited by
16
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Physics World (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Cellular Automata and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Mechanics and Applications
Keywords
digital physics, quantum computing, cellular automata, quantum mechanics

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review