Cited by 9Education, Achievement, and GiftednessPsychometric Methodologies and TestingMotivation and Self-Concept in Sports

Development of the Japanese version of Achievement Emotions Questionnaire in a test situation

Open access
Ikeda, Yasuyo·2015·The Japanese journal of psychology

Abstract

This study aimed to develop the Japanese version of the Achievement Emotions Questionnaire in a test situation and to examine its reliability and validity. In a test situation, undergraduate students (N = 369) completed a questionnaire including the Achievement Emotions Scale (AES) that contains 8 sub-scales: enjoyment, hope, pride, relief, angry, anxiety, shame, and hopelessness. The validity of AES was evaluated using academic control, self-efficacy, task-value, the Japanese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule scale, motivational style, learning strategies, and test scores (n = 191). The component structures of AES were tested among three models for each of the 8 sub-scales through Structural Equation Modeling. Results suggest that for most scales, hierarchical models were superior for fit indexes, and reliability was confirmed. Further, positive achievement emotions were positively related to academic control, self-efficacy, positive affect, intrinsic regulation, metacognitive strategies, and deep-processing strategies, while negative achievement emotions were positively related to negative affect, introjected regulation, and external regulation. These results were confirmed to be consistent with previous studies, and indicated new research directions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.4992/jjpsy.86.14219

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 15 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. matics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 105 - 120.
  2. Ida, K. (2003a). An attempt to construct the academic task-values evaluation scale for high school students: Focusing on the motivation to study English as a for- eign language. Bulletin of the Graduate School of Education and Human Development, Nagoya University: Psychology and Human Developmental Sciences, 50, 71 -81.)
  3. Ida, K. (2003b). Autonomous motivation in college education majors: Ego-identity, achievement motiva- tion, occupational readiness, and task-value evalua- tion. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 367 -377.)
  4. 長沼 君主(2004) .自律性と関係性からみた内発的動 機づけ研究 上淵 寿(編著)動機づけ研究の最前 線 北大路書房 pp. 30 -60. (Naganuma, N.) 西村 多久磨・河村 茂雄・櫻井 茂男(2011) .自律的 な学習動機づけとメタ認知的方略が学業成績を予 測するプロセス -内発的な学習動機づけは学習 動機づけを予測することができるのか? -教 育心理学研究, 59, 77 -87.
  5. Nishimura, T., Kawamura, S., & Sakurai, S. (2011). Autonomous motivation and meta-cognitive strategies as predictors of academic performance: Does intrinsic motivation predict academic performance? Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 59, 77 -87.)
  6. Okada, R., & Nakaya, M. (2006). Motivational style and interest in tasks: Self-determination theory. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 1 - 11.
  7. Pekrun, R., & Perry, R. P. (2014). Control-Value Theory of achievement emotions. In R. Pekrun & L. Linnenbrink- Garcia (Eds.), International handbook of emotions in education. New York: Routledge. pp. 120 -141.
  8. Sakurai, S. (1986). Investigation of children's three dimensional and domain-specific scale of perceived control. Japanese Journal of Educational Psychology, 34, 267 -273.)
  9. Sato, A., & Yasuda, A. (2001). Development of the Japanese version of Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) scales. Japanese Journal of Personality, 9, 138 -139.)
  10. Uebuchi, H. (1994). Emotions in educational situa- tions. Bulletin of the Faculty of Education, University of Tokyo, 34, 229 -233.)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ikeda, Y.
Affiliations
Kyoto University of Education (JP)
Corresponding author
Ikeda, Yasuyo
Venue
The Japanese journal of psychology
Published
2015
Volume
86
Issue
5
Pages
456-466
ISSN
  • 0021-5236 (ISSN-L)
  • 1884-1082
OpenAlex
W2679018721
Cited by
9
References
15
Citations by year
2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 3
FWCI
1.51
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
The Japanese journal of psychology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
Keywords
Achievement Emotions Questionnaire, achievement emotions, Japanese adaptation, test situations, questionnaire development, reliability statistics, validity, academic control, self-efficacy, task value, motivational regulation, metacognitive strategies, deep processing, positive and negative affect, intrinsic motivation, introjected regulation, external regulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review