CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 46

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Treatability of raw textile wastewater using Fenton process and its comparison with chemical coagulation

Ilhan, Fatih, Ulucan-Altuntas, Kubra, Dogan, Can, Kurt, Ugur·2019·Desalination and Water Treatment
DOI 10.5004/dwt.2019.24332
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The textile industry has significant effects on the environment due to the intensive water consumption and the use of toxic raw materials. Every succeeding day, water quality to receive water environments is deteriorating due to the high amount of wastewater generated by the textile sector. In this study, the performance of the Fenton Process has been optimized to minimize the damage of acrylic yarn dye-house wastewater to the environment regarding operating conditions, Fe(II) and H 2 O 2 dosages, pH and reaction time using the response surface methodology method over chemical oxygen demand (COD), colour and total organic carbon (TOC) measurement parameters. The results were compared with the results of chemical coagulation. The most effective parameter of the Fenton Process was determined as Fe(II) dosage for this kind of wastewater sample. As a result of the optimization, efficiencies by 82.8%, 96.2%, and 75.6% were obtained for COD, colour and TOC removal, respectively, by means of the Fenton process. The total treatment cost was determined as 1.216 € per 1 m 3 textile wastewater. According to the experimental results, both processes were found to be effective for colour removal, whereas chemical coagulation was found to be insufficient for COD removal. When the two processes were compared in terms of sludge amount, the Fenton process was found to produce less sludge by 1.60 kg sludge/kg COD.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5004/dwt.2019.24332

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 30

  1. Kobya, 2014, Treatment of textile dyeing wastewater by electrocoagulation using Fe and Al electrodes: optimisation of operating parameters using central composite design, Color. Technol., 130, 226, 10.1111/cote.12090 · DOI
  2. Kaykioglu, 2017, Evaluation of effects of textile wastewater on the quality of cotton fabric dye, Membr, Water Treat., 8, 1, 10.12989/mwt.2017.8.1.001 · DOI
  3. Nawaz, 2014, Comparison of physico-chemical, advanced oxidation and biological techniques for the textile wastewater treatment, Alexandria Eng. J., 53, 717, 10.1016/j.aej.2014.06.007 · DOI
  4. Ansari, 2011, Application of polyaniline as an efficient and novel adsorbent for azo dyes removal from textile wastewaters, Chem. Pap., 65, 1, 10.2478/s11696-010-0083-x · DOI
  5. Mirzadeh, 2014, Decolorization of two synthetic dyes using the purified laccase of Paraconiothyrium variabile immobilized on porous silica beads, J. Environ. Health Sci. Eng., 12, 6, 10.1186/2052-336X-12-6 · DOI
  6. Ulucan, 2015, Comparative study of electrochemical wastewater treatment processes for bilge water as oily wastewater: a kinetic approach, J. Electroanal. Chem., 747, 104, 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.04.005 · DOI
  7. Ilhan, 2017, Evaluation of operational parameters and its relation on the stoichiometry of Fenton’s oxidation to textile wastewater, Chem. Ind. Chem. Eng. Q., 23, 11, 10.2298/CICEQ150907048I · DOI
  8. Sun, 2009, Fenton oxidative decolorization of the azo dye Direct Blue 15 in aqueous solution, Chem. Eng. J., 155, 680, 10.1016/j.cej.2009.08.027 · DOI
  9. Ahmadi, 2018, Combination of UVC-LEDs and ultrasound for peroxymonosulfate activation to degrade synthetic dye: influence of promotional and inhibitory agents and application for real wastewater, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., 25, 6003, 10.1007/s11356-017-0936-8 · DOI
  10. Klepacz-Smółka, 2010, Application of anoxic fixed film and aerobic CSTR bioreactor in treatment of nanofiltration concentrate of real textile wastewater, Chem. Pap., 64, 230, 10.2478/s11696-009-0115-6 · DOI
  11. Naje, 2017, A review of electrocoagulation technology for the treatment of textile wastewater, Rev. Chem. Eng., 33, 263, 10.1515/revce-2016-0019 · DOI
  12. Shirmardi, 2013, The adsorption of malachite green (MG) as a cationic dye onto functionalized multi walled carbon nanotubes, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30, 1603, 10.1007/s11814-013-0080-1 · DOI
  13. Dalvand, 2016, Modeling of Reactive Blue 19 azo dye removal from colored textile wastewater using L-arginine-functionalized Fe3O4 nanoparticles: optimization, reusability, kinetic and equilibrium studies, J. Magn. Magn. Mater., 404, 179, 10.1016/j.jmmm.2015.12.040 · DOI
  14. Avlonitis, 2008, Simulated cotton dye effluents treatment and reuse by nanofiltration, Desalination, 221, 259, 10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.082 · DOI
  15. Baban, 2003, Ozonation of high strength segregated effluents from a woollen textile dyeing and finishing plant, Dyes Pigm., 58, 93, 10.1016/S0143-7208(03)00047-0 · DOI
  16. Rajkumar, 2006, Oxidation of various reactive dyes with in situ electro-generated active chlorine for textile dyeing industry wastewater treatment, J. Hazard. Mater., 136, 203, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2005.11.096 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Moradi, 2016, Direct Blue 71 removal by electrocoagulation sludge recycling in photo-Fenton process: response surface modeling and optimization, Desal. Wat. Treat, 57, 4659, 10.1080/19443994.2014.995714 · DOI
  18. Mackul’ak, 2011, Toxicity reduction of 2-(5-nitrofuryl)acrylic acid following Fenton reaction treatment, Chem. Pap., 65, 835
  19. Mackul’ak, 2012, Reduction of ostazine dyes’ photodynamic effect by Fenton reaction, Chem. Pap., 66, 156
  20. Antonin, 2015, Degradation of Evans Blue diazo dye by electrochemical processes based on Fenton’s reaction chemistry, J. Electroanal. Chem., 747, 1, 10.1016/j.jelechem.2015.03.032 · DOI
  21. Malik, 2017, Comparison of coagulation, ozone and ferrate treatment processes for color, COD and toxicity removal from complex textile wastewater, Water Sci. Technol., 76, 1001, 10.2166/wst.2017.062 · DOI
  22. GilPavas, 2017, Coagulationflocculation sequential with Fenton or photo-Fenton processes as an alternative for the industrial textile wastewater treatment, J. Environ. Manage., 191, 189, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.01.015 · DOI
  23. Grisales, 2019, Treatment of synthetic dye baths by Fenton processes: evaluation of their environmental footprint through life cycle assessment, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 26, 4300, 10.1007/s11356-018-2757-9 · DOI
  24. Kang, 1999, Correction of hydrogen peroxide interference on standard chemical oxygen demand test, Water Res., 33, 1247, 10.1016/S0043-1354(98)00315-7 · DOI
  25. Talinli, 1992, Interference of hydrogen peroxide on the standard cod test, Water Res., 26, 107, 10.1016/0043-1354(92)90118-N · DOI
  26. Ulucan, 2014, Electrocoagulation process application in bilge water treatment using response surface methodology, Int. J. Electrochem. Sci., 9, 2316, 10.1016/S1452-3981(23)07929-4 · DOI
  27. Moradi, 2015, Removal of acid yellow 36 using Box-Behnken designed photoelectro-Fenton: a study on removal mechanisms, Toxicol. Environ. Chem., 97, 700, 10.1080/02772248.2015.1060975 · DOI
  28. Sohrabi, 2017, Removal of carmoisine edible dye by Fenton and photo Fenton processes using Taguchi orthogonal array design, Arabian J. Chem., 10, S3523, 10.1016/j.arabjc.2014.02.019 · DOI
  29. Barbusiński, 2005, The modified fenton process for decolorization of dye wastewater, Pol. J. Environ. Stud., 14, 281
  30. Bazrafshan, 2016, Textile wastewater treatment by application of combined chemical coagulation, electrocoagulation, and adsorption processes, Desal. Wat. Treat., 57, 9203, 10.1080/19443994.2015.1027960 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Ilhan, F., Ulucan-Altuntas, K., Dogan, C., & Kurt, U.
Venue
Desalination and Water Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-09
Volume
162
Pages
142-148
ISSN
1944-3986
DOI
10.5004/dwt.2019.24332
Cited by
46
References
0
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review