CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 38

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

CPP–ACP and Fluoride: A Synergism to Combat Caries

Naik, Saraswathi V, Attiguppe, Prabhakar, Malik, Neetu, Ballal, Shivani·2019·International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
DOI 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1608PMC PMC6749876
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1608

Cites

Statistics

Figures

Flowchart 1 Specimen distribution
Flowchart 1 Specimen distributionCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 1 Demineralization in group MI (D = 99.18 μm)
Fig. 1 Demineralization in group MI (D = 99.18 μm)CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 2 Demineralization in group FP (D = 119.28 μm)
Fig. 2 Demineralization in group FP (D = 119.28 μm)CC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 3 Zones of bacterial inhibition observed around the wells of the two groups
Fig. 3 Zones of bacterial inhibition observed around the wells of the two groupsCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 4 Intergroup comparison of fluoride release at different time intervals
Fig. 4 Intergroup comparison of fluoride release at different time intervalsCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 5 Intergroup comparison of cumulative fluoride release after a period of 1 month
Fig. 5 Intergroup comparison of cumulative fluoride release after a period of 1 monthCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 6 Intergroup comparison of mean depth of demineralization
Fig. 6 Intergroup comparison of mean depth of demineralizationCC BY-NC · PubMed Central
Fig. 7 Intergroup comparison of zones of growth inhibition produced against S. mutans after 48 hours
Fig. 7 Intergroup comparison of zones of growth inhibition produced against S. mutans after 48 hoursCC BY-NC · PubMed Central

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 34

  1. 1. Walsh LJ, Brostek AM. Minimum intervention dentistry principles and objectives. Aust Dent J 2013 Jun;58(Suppl 1):3–16. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12045. · DOI
  2. 2. Fejerskov O. Changing paradigms in concepts on dental caries: consequences for oral health care. Caries Res 2004 May–Jun;38(3): 182–191. DOI: 10.1159/000077753. · DOI · Paper page
  3. 3. Dholam KP, Somani PP, et al. Effectiveness of Fluoride Varnish Application as Cariostatic and Desensitizing Agent in Irradiated Head and Neck Cancer Patients. Int J Dent 2013;2013:824982. DOI: 10.1155/2013/824982. · DOI
  4. 5. American Dental Association Council on Scientific Affairs. Professionally applied topical fluoride: Evidence-based clinical recommendations. J Am Dent Assoc 2006 Aug 31;137(8):1151–1159. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2006.0356. · DOI · Paper page
  5. 6. Santos Lde M, Reis JI, et al. In vitro evaluation of fluoride products in the development of carious lesions in deciduous teeth. Braz Oral Res 2009;23:296–301. DOI: 10.1590/S1806-83242009000300012. · DOI
  6. 7. Kalra DD, Kalra RD, et al. Nonfluorideremineralization. An evidencebased review of contemporary technologies. J Dent Allied Sci 2014;3:24–33. DOI: 10.4103/2277-4696.156525. · DOI · Paper page
  7. 8. Reynolds EC. Remineralization of Enamel Subsurface lesions by Casein Phosphopeptide-stabilized Calcium Phosphate Solutions. J Dent Res 1997;76:1587–1589. DOI: 10.1177/00220345970760091101. · DOI
  8. 9. Schüpbach P, Neeser JR, et al. Incorporation of caseinoglycomacropeptide and caseinophosphopeptide into the salivary pellicle inhibits adherence of mutans streptococci. J Dent Res 1996 Oct;75(10):1779–1788. DOI: 10.1177/00220345960750101101. · DOI · Paper page
  9. 11. Cochrane NJ, Shen P, et al. Ion release from calcium and fluoride containing dental varnishes. Aust Dent J 2014 Mar;59(1):100–105. DOI: 10.1111/adj.12144. · DOI · Paper page
  10. 12. Cochrane NJ, Cai F, et al. New approaches to enhanced remineralization of tooth enamel. J Dent Res 2010;89:1187–1197. DOI: 10.1177/0022034510376046. · DOI
  11. 13. Duraisamy V, Xavier A, et al. An in vitro evaluation of the demineralization inhibitory effect of F- varnish and casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate on enamel in young permanent teeth. J Pharm Bioall Sci 2015;7:S513–S517. DOI: 10.4103/0975-7406.163521. · DOI
  12. 14. Prabhakar AR, Manojkumar AJ, et al. In vitro remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions and assessment of dentine tubule occlusion from NaF dentifrices with and without calcium. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent 2013 Jan-Mar;31(1):29–35. DOI: 10.4103/0970-4388.112403. · DOI
  13. 15. Oncag G, Tuncer AV, et al. Acidic soft drinks effects on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets and a scanning electron microscopy evaluation of the enamel. Angle Orthod 2005 Mar;75(2):247–253.
  14. 16. Jablonowski BL, Bartoloni JA, et al. Fluoride release from newly marketed fluoride varnishes. Quintessence Intl 2012 Mar 1;43(3):221–228.
  15. 17. Arul SK, Rajendra SC, et al. Antibacterial activity of bee propolis against clinical strains of Streptococcus mutans and synergism with chlorhexidine. Int J Pharm Sci Res 2011 Jan-Mar;2(1):85–90. · DOI
  16. 18. Kumar MM, Pai BH, et al. Antibacterial properties of fluoride releasing glass ionomer cement and pit and fissure sealants on Streptococcus mutans. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2010 May-Aug;3(2):93–96. DOI: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1060. · DOI
  17. 19. Stewart RE, Hale KJ. The paradigm shift in the etiology, prevention, and management of dental caries: its effect on the practice of clinical dentistry. J Calif Dent Assoc 2003 Mar;31(3):247–251. · DOI
  18. 20. Schemehorn BR, Wood GD, et al. Comparison of fluoride uptake into tooth enamel from two fluoride varnishes containing different calcium phosphate sources. J Clin Dent 2011;22(2):51–54.
  19. 21. Longbottom C, Ekstrand K, et al. Novel preventive treatment options. Monogr Oral Sci 2009;21:156–163. · DOI
  20. 22. Proskin HM. Statistical considerations related to the use of caries model systems for the determination of clinical effectiveness of therapeutic agents. Adv Dent Res 1995 Nov;9(3):270–278. DOI: 10.1177/08959374950090031101. · DOI
  21. 23. Theuns HM, Van Dijk JWE, et al. Effect of time and degree of saturation of buffer solutions on artificial carious lesion formation in human tooth enamel. Caries Res 1983;17(6):503–521. DOI: 10.1159/000260710. · DOI
  22. 24. Featherstone JDB. Prevention and reversal of dental caries: role of low level fluoride. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 1999 Feb;27(1):31–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1600-0528.1999.tb01989.x. · DOI
  23. 25. Hong YC, Chow LC, et al. Enhanced fluoride uptake from mouth rinses. J Dent Res 1985 Feb;64(2):82–84. DOI: 10.1177/00220345850640021401. · DOI
  24. 26. Chow LC, Guo MK, et al. Apatitic Fluoride increase in enamel from a topical treatment involving intermediate CaHPO4·2H2 O formation, an in vivo study. Caries Res 1981;15(5):369–376. DOI: 10.1159/000260540. · DOI
  25. 27. Wilson N. Minimally invasive dentistry-the management of dental caries. London: Quintessence; 2007. pp. 69–70.
  26. 28. Oshiro M, Yamaguchi K, et al. Effect of CPP-ACP paste on tooth mineralization: an FE-SEM study. J Oral Sci 2007 Jun;49(2):115–120. DOI: 10.2334/josnusd.49.115. · DOI
  27. 29. Rahiotis C, Vougiouklakis G. Effect of a CPP-ACP agent on the demineralization and remineralization of dentine in vitro. J Dent 2007 Aug;35(8):695–698. DOI: 10.1016/j.jdent.2007.05.008. · DOI
  28. 30. Kumar VL, Itthagarun A, et al. The effect of casein phosphopeptideamorphous calcium phosphate on remineralization of artificial carieslike lesions: an in vitro study. Aust Dent J 2008 Mar;53(1):34–40. DOI: 10.1111/j.1834-7819.2007.00006.x. · DOI
  29. 31. Shen P, Cai F, et al. Remineralization of enamel subsurface lesions by sugar-free chewing gum containing casein phosphopeptideamorphous calcium phosphate. J Dent Res 2001 Dec;80(12):2066–2070. DOI: 10.1177/00220345010800120801. · DOI · Paper page
  30. 32. Tabrizi A, Cakirer B. A comparative evaluation of casein phosphopeptide-amorphous calcium phosphate and fluoride on the shear bond strength of orthodontic brackets. Eur J Orthod 2011 Jun;33(3):282–287. DOI: 10.1093/ejo/cjq062. · DOI
  31. 34. Hatibovic-Kofman S, Koch G, et al. Glass ionomer materials as a rechargeable fluoride-release system. Int J Paediatr Dent 1997 Jun;7(2):65–73. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.1997.tb00281.x. 35 Carvalho AS, Cury JA. Fluoride release from some dental materials in different solutions. Oper Dent 1999 Jan-Feb;24(1):14–19. · DOI
  32. 36. Ajdiæ D, et al. Genome sequence of Streptococcus mutans UA159, a cariogenic dental pathogen. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002 Oct 29;99(22):14434–14439. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.172501299. · DOI
  33. 37. Tanzer JM, Livingston J, et al. The microbiology of primary dental caries in humans. J Dent Educ 2001 Oct;65(10):1028–1037. · DOI
  34. 38. Vermeersch G, Leloup G, et al. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: relationship between acidity and material setting phase. J Oral Rehabil 2005 May;32(5): 368–374. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01300.x. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Naik, S. V., Attiguppe, P., Malik, N., & Ballal, S.
Venue
International Journal of Clinical Pediatric Dentistry
Publisher
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishing
Published
2019
Volume
12
Issue
2
Pages
120-125
ISSN
  • 0974-7052
  • 0975-1904
DOI
10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1608
PMC
PMC6749876
Cited by
38
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review