The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Goal Attainment Scaling as a Method of Clinical Service Evaluation
Abstract
The demand for clinical accountability and the documentation of therapeutic effectiveness continues to increase in health-related settings. Therapists are attempting to address this increasing demand by adapting methods based on traditional experimental models of research to evaluate their clinical practice. Experimental and quasi-experimental designs, however, are often of limited usefulness in clinical environments for a variety of practical and ethical reasons. This paper presents a method of evaluating the effectiveness of a therapeutic intervention called goal attainment scaling, which involves goal setting procedures and assessment techniques that are practice-based and practitioner-oriented. The procedures are presented and the argument made that goal attainment scaling is a viable method by which one can document therapeutic change and demonstrate clinical accountability.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Virtual Environments for Motor Rehabilitation: Review
Holden, M. K. (2005) · CyberPsychology & Behavior · doi:10.1089/cpb.2005.8.187 · Cited by 1,154
Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupat189ional Performance Measure in stroke patients
Cup, E. H. C., Scholte op Reimer, W. J. M., Thijssen, M. C. E., & van Kuyk-Minis, M. A. H. (2003) · Clinical Rehabilitation · doi:10.1191/0269215503cr635oa · Cited by 364
King, G. A., McDougall, J., Palisano, R. J., Gritzan, J., & Tucker, M. A. (2000) · Physical & Occupational Therapy In Pediatrics · doi:10.1080/j006v19n02_03 · Cited by 260
Bard-Pondarré, R., Villepinte, C., Roumenoff, F., Lebrault, H., Bonnyaud, C., Pradeau, C., Bensmail, D., Isner-Horobeti, M.-E., & Krasny-Pacini, A. (2023) · Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine · doi:10.2340/jrm.v55.6498 · Cited by 56
Schreiber, J., Stern, P., Marchetti, G., & Provident, I. (2009) · Physical Therapy · doi:10.2522/ptj.20080260 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Ottenbacher, K. J., & Cusick, A.
- Venue
- The American Journal of Occupational Therapy
- Publisher
- AOTA Press
- Published
- 1990-06-01
- Volume
- 44
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 519-525
- ISSN
- 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-7676
- OpenAlex
- W2104780627
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Goal Attainment Scaling as a Method of Clinical Service Evaluation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5014/ajot.44.6.519
- The paper
- Ottenbacher, K. J., & Cusick, A. (1990). Goal Attainment Scaling as a Method of Clinical Service Evaluation. The American Journal of Occupational Therapy. https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.44.6.519
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.