Cited by 56Medical Practices and RehabilitationOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Goal Attainment Scaling in rehabilitation: An educational review providing a comprehensive didactical tool box for implementing Goal Attainment Scaling

Open access
Bard-Pondarré, Rachel, Villepinte, Claire, Roumenoff, Fabienne, Lebrault, Hélène, Bonnyaud, Céline, Pradeau, Charles, Bensmail, Djamel, Isner-Horobeti, Marie-Eve +1 more·2023·Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

Abstract

Context: Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) is a person-centered and collaborative approach, allowing to assess the effectiveness of an intervention on personally relevant goals. However, GAS is not a “scale” but a heterogeneous group of methodologies, including many variations and lack of consensus on high quality GAS. Objective: The aim of this communication is to: 1. provide updated didactical information on GAS use in PRM practice and research; 2. increase awareness of GAS methodological challenges; 3. guide use of GAS as an integrated process of rehabilitation after goal setting and; 4. provide updated resources for self-directed learning and extensive supplemental material to increase knowledge and practical skills in GAS use.Methods: Educational literature review about current GAS applications relevant to PRM fields. Results: Practical advice is provided regarding clinical challenges in GAS: definition of 0 level, time-frame and means employed to attain the goal, dealing with unforeseen pattern of improvement, synthesizing the numerous significations of “SMART” goal acronym to guide best use of GAS, and thinking flexibility on the type of relevant goals that can be set. Challenges with GAS in rehabilitation research are presented in order to promote researcher’s and reviewer’s awareness on reliable use of GAS and encouraging best-use of GAS. LAY ABSTRACTThe goal attainment scaling methodology is a relevant way of measuring the effectiveness of a treatment, by creating scales to measure whether the goals previously identified with the person have been achieved through the treatment. There are many goal attainment scaling methodological variants, with a significant impact on results, of which users are not always aware. The aims of this review of the literature regarding current applications of goal attainment scaling in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine fields, are to (i) provide up-to-date didactic information on the use of goal attainment scaling in Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine practice and research; (ii) raise awareness of the methodological challenges of goal attainment scaling; (iii) guide the use of goal attainment scaling to support the rehabilitation process after goal setting; and (iv) provide up-to-date resources for self-directed training. Practical guidelines are provided for the use of goal attainment scaling in clinical practice, and the challenges of use of this methodology in rehabilitation research are presented in order to educate researchers and evaluators on the reliable use of goal attainment scaling.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.2340/jrm.v55.6498

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bard-Pondarré, R., Villepinte, C., Roumenoff, F., Lebrault, H., Bonnyaud, C., Pradeau, C., Bensmail, D., Isner-Horobeti, M.-E., & Krasny-Pacini, A.
Affiliations
  • Université de Toulouse (FR)
  • Sorbonne Université (FR)
  • Université Paris-Saclay (FR)
  • Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg (FR)
Corresponding author
Bard-Pondarré, Rachel
Venue
Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine
Published
2023-06-14
Volume
55
Pages
jrm6498
ISSN
  • 1650-1977 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2081
OpenAlex
W4380680417
Cited by
56
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 20 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 22
FWCI
3.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Medical Practices and Rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
goal attainment scaling, rehabilitation, goal setting, SMART goals, outcome measurement, person-centred care, clinical teaching, self-directed learning, methodological issues
MeSH terms
Rehabilitation Research, Communication, Goals, Humans, Consensus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review