Cited by 65Children's Physical and Motor DevelopmentOccupational Therapy Practice and ResearchCerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders

Use of the Bruininks-Oseretsky test of motor proficiency in occupational therapy

Wilson, Brenda N., Polatajko, Helene J., Kaplan, Bonnie J., Faris, Peter·1995·American Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: In addition to the need for good measurement tools in occupational therapy, there is a need for the tools to be used knowledgeably. The purpose of this article is to investigate the usefulness of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency (BOTMP) for both descriptive (diagnostic) and evaluative (change over time) purposes. METHOD: The typical profile of subtest scores for children with mild motor problems revealed that certain subtests of the BOTMP may be better indicators of motor problems for these children than others. An analysis also was performed to compare the use of raw (point) scores with standard (age-adjusted) scores in evaluating change. RESULTS: Four subtests that provide a greater degree of discrimination between children with and without motor problems were identified. Raw (points) scores were found to provide a more valid measure of change over time than standard (age-related) scores. CONCLUSION: We recommend that, for clinical use, the BOTMP subtest standard scores be used for diagnostic purposes and that the raw scores be used for evaluative purposes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5014/ajot.49.1.8

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Longer institutionalization histories were associated with significantly lower scores than shorter institutionalization histories on vestibular-proprioceptive, visual, and praxis areas of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests, as well as balance.

    “Similarly, longer institutionalization histories were associated with significantly lower scores than shorter institutionalization histories on vestibular-proprioceptive, visual, and praxis areas of the Sensory Integration and Praxis Tests,23 as well as balance.24”
  • Postinstitutionalized children have delays in balance and bilateral coordination compared with never institutionalized children which placement in a family setting does not adequately remediate.

    “postinstitutionalized children have delays in balance and bilateral coordination compared with never institutionalized children which placement in a family setting does not adequately remediate.24”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wilson, B. N., Polatajko, H. J., Kaplan, B. J., & Faris, P.
Affiliations
  • Alberta Children's Hospital (CA)
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
Venue
American Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
1995-01
Volume
49
Issue
1
Pages
8-17
ISSN
  • 0272-9490 (ISSN-L)
  • 1943-7676
OpenAlex
W2047323038
Cited by
62
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Keywords
Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, motor function assessment, subtest selection, change over time, diagnostic validity, occupational therapy assessment
MeSH terms
Analysis of Variance, Child, Developmental Disabilities, Child, Preschool, Disability Evaluation, Humans, Learning Disabilities, Motor Skills, Occupational Therapy, Psychomotor Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review