Cited by 34Spacecraft Design and TechnologySpacecraft Dynamics and ControlSpace Satellite Systems and Control

Comparison of the Incident Solar Energy and Battery Storage in a 3U CubeSat Satellite for Different Orientation Scenarios

Open access
Sanchez-Sanjuan, Sergio, Gonzalez-Llorente, Jesus, Hurtado-Velasco, Ronald·2016·Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management

Abstract

ABSTRACT In CubeSats, because the size is limited, the estimation of the incident solar energy according to the orbital parameters and satellite attitude is more critical for the design process of the electrical power system. This estimation is helpful either for sizing of the power sources and energy storage or for defining the operation modes of the CubeSat with the energy available. This paper describes the kinematic and dynamic equations to derive the CubeSat attitude; similarly, the mathematical models of solar cells and batteries are also derived to calculate the energy harvested and stored. By determining the attitude of a 3U CubeSat over one orbit, we estimated the incident solar energy and thus the energy generated by the solar cells and energy stored in batteries when a direct energy-transfer architecture is used. In addition, these estimations where performed for three orientation scenarios: nadir-pointing, Sun-pointing and free-orientation. The estimated incident average solar energy for the three scenarios indicated that the Sun-pointing and free-orientation scenarios harvest more energy than the nadir-pointing one. This estimation is also helpful to predict the state of charge of the batteries in standby mode, allowing for determination of the time required for charging the batteries and, hence, the operating modes of the CubeSat. We expect to include the consumed energy while considering all of the operating modes of the satellite as well as different orbital parameters.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5028/jatm.v8i1.531

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 16 · Cited by 34

Authors
Sanchez-Sanjuan, S., Gonzalez-Llorente, J., & Hurtado-Velasco, R.
Affiliations
Universidad Sergio Arboleda (CO)
Venue
Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management
Published
2016-03-07
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
91-102
ISSN
  • 1984-9648 (ISSN-L)
  • 2175-9146
OpenAlex
W2294420260
Cited by
34
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
FWCI
3.26
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Espace ÉTS (ETS) (submittedVersion)
  • Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
Keywords
CubeSat, battery energy storage, satellite attitude estimation, solar cell modeling, battery modeling, direct energy transfer, satellite power systems, state of charge

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review