Comparison of the Incident Solar Energy and Battery Storage in a 3U CubeSat Satellite for Different Orientation Scenarios
Open accessAbstract
ABSTRACT In CubeSats, because the size is limited, the estimation of the incident solar energy according to the orbital parameters and satellite attitude is more critical for the design process of the electrical power system. This estimation is helpful either for sizing of the power sources and energy storage or for defining the operation modes of the CubeSat with the energy available. This paper describes the kinematic and dynamic equations to derive the CubeSat attitude; similarly, the mathematical models of solar cells and batteries are also derived to calculate the energy harvested and stored. By determining the attitude of a 3U CubeSat over one orbit, we estimated the incident solar energy and thus the energy generated by the solar cells and energy stored in batteries when a direct energy-transfer architecture is used. In addition, these estimations where performed for three orientation scenarios: nadir-pointing, Sun-pointing and free-orientation. The estimated incident average solar energy for the three scenarios indicated that the Sun-pointing and free-orientation scenarios harvest more energy than the nadir-pointing one. This estimation is also helpful to predict the state of charge of the batteries in standby mode, allowing for determination of the time required for charging the batteries and, hence, the operating modes of the CubeSat. We expect to include the consumed energy while considering all of the operating modes of the satellite as well as different orbital parameters.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The simulation with the satellite pathway facing nadir obtained an energy generation of 26.19 Wh/orbit.
“Based on the listed parameters, the simulation is performed in MATLAB with the satellite pathway facing the nadir, obtaining an energy generation of 26.19 Wh/orbit [17].”
From A Method for Validating CubeSat Satellite EPS Through Power Budget Analysis Aligned With Mission Requirements (2023) · cites this paper as [17]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 16 · Cited by 34
- Authors
- Sanchez-Sanjuan, S., Gonzalez-Llorente, J., & Hurtado-Velasco, R.
- Affiliations
- Universidad Sergio Arboleda (CO)
- Venue
- Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management
- Publisher
- FapUNIFESP (SciELO)
- Published
- 2016-03-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 91-102
- ISSN
- 1984-9648 (ISSN-L)
- 2175-9146
- OpenAlex
- W2294420260
- Cited by
- 34
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 1
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by
- Locations
- Journal of Aerospace Technology and Management (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Espace ÉTS (ETS) (submittedVersion)
- Redalyc (Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Dynamics and Control
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Space Satellite Systems and Control
- Keywords
- CubeSat, battery energy storage, satellite attitude estimation, solar cell modeling, battery modeling, direct energy transfer, satellite power systems, state of charge
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review