Cited by 835Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political ViolenceIslamic Studies and RadicalismAnarchism and Radical Politics

Radicalization into Violent Extremism I: A Review of Social Science Theories

Open access
Borum, Randy·2011·Journal of Strategic Security

Abstract

In discourse about countering terrorism, the term "radicalization" is widely used, but remains poorly defined. To focus narrowly on ideological radicalization risks implying that radical beliefs are a proxy—or at least a necessary precursor—for terrorism, though we know this not to be true.Different pathways and mechanisms of terrorism involvement operate in different ways for different people at different points in time and perhaps in different contexts. This article explores the problems in defining radicalization and radicalism, and suggests that radicalization—and more specifically, involvement in terrorism—might best be viewed as a set of diverse processes. It goes on to review several potentially promising theories that might support further study of those processes, including social movement theory, social psychology, and conversion theory. Finally, it describes some possible frameworks for understanding how the processes might facilitate terrorism-related behavior.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5038/1944-0472.4.4.1

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Borum, R.
Affiliations
University of South Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Borum, Randy
Venue
Journal of Strategic Security
Published
2011-12
Volume
4
Issue
4
Pages
7-36
ISSN
  • 1944-0464 (ISSN-L)
  • 1944-0472
OpenAlex
W2136223053
Cited by
835
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 63 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
FWCI
32.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • Journal of Strategic Security (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Islamic Studies and Radicalism
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Anarchism and Radical Politics
Keywords
radicalization, violent extremism, terrorism, counterterrorism, social movement theory, social psychology, conversion theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review