Radicalization into Violent Extremism I: A Review of Social Science Theories
Open accessAbstract
In discourse about countering terrorism, the term "radicalization" is widely used, but remains poorly defined. To focus narrowly on ideological radicalization risks implying that radical beliefs are a proxy—or at least a necessary precursor—for terrorism, though we know this not to be true.Different pathways and mechanisms of terrorism involvement operate in different ways for different people at different points in time and perhaps in different contexts. This article explores the problems in defining radicalization and radicalism, and suggests that radicalization—and more specifically, involvement in terrorism—might best be viewed as a set of diverse processes. It goes on to review several potentially promising theories that might support further study of those processes, including social movement theory, social psychology, and conversion theory. Finally, it describes some possible frameworks for understanding how the processes might facilitate terrorism-related behavior.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The contemporary online environment compresses and accelerates the stages of radicalisation.
“but the contemporary online environment compresses and accelerates these stages [3].”
From Geopolitical competition, online radicalisation, and organisational culture as vectors of the evolving insider threat (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
The peer-reviewed radicalisation literature converges on a picture more complex than classical ideological typologies admit.
“The peer-reviewed radicalisation literature converges on a picture more complex than classical ideological typologies admit.”
From Geopolitical competition, online radicalisation, and organisational culture as vectors of the evolving insider threat (2026) · cites this paper as [3]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
An Exploration of the Involuntary Celibate (Incel) Subculture Online
O’Malley, R. L., Holt, K., & Holt, T. J. (2022) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260520959625 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
The Role of Perceived Injustice and Need for Esteem on Incel Membership Online
O’Malley, R. L., & Helm, B. (2023) · Deviant Behavior · doi:10.1080/01639625.2022.2133650 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Hihara, S., Sugimura, K., & Syed, M. (2018) · Identity · doi:10.1080/15283488.2018.1524329 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
Baruch, B., Ling, T., Warnes, R., & Hofman, J. (2018) · Evaluation · doi:10.1177/1356389018803218 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Wood, P. (2026) · Discover Global Society · doi:10.1007/s44282-026-00510-7
“Moghaddam’s staircase model posits progressive narrowing through stages of radicalisation [35], but the contemporary online environment compresses and accelerates these stages [3].”
- Authors
- Borum, R.
- Affiliations
- University of South Florida (US)
- Corresponding author
- Borum, Randy
- ORCID
- Borum, Randy
- Venue
- Journal of Strategic Security
- Published
- 2011-12
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 7-36
- ISSN
- 1944-0464 (ISSN-L)
- 1944-0472
- OpenAlex
- W2136223053
- Cited by
- 835
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 63 · 2025: 79 · 2024: 74 · 2023: 72 · 2022: 71 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 103 · 2019: 63 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 67 · 2016: 41 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 17 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 32.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- cc-by-nc
- Locations
- Journal of Strategic Security (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Digital Commons - University of South Florida (University of South Florida) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Islamic Studies and Radicalism
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Anarchism and Radical Politics
- Keywords
- radicalization, violent extremism, terrorism, counterterrorism, social movement theory, social psychology, conversion theory
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review