The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology
Open accessAbstract
No description available
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions
Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005 · Cited by 2,238
Self-citationGrassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda
Seyfang, G., & Smith, A. (2007) · Environmental Politics · doi:10.1080/09644010701419121 · Cited by 1,777
Responsible research and innovation: From science in society to science for society, with society
Owen, R., Macnaghten, P., & Stilgoe, J. (2012) · Science and Public Policy · doi:10.1093/scipol/scs093 · Cited by 1,607
Barry, A., Born, G., & Weszkalnys, G. (2008) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085140701760841 · Cited by 586
Coping with Complexity, Uncertainty and Ambiguity in Risk Governance: A Synthesis
Renn, O., Klinke, A., & van Asselt, M. (2011) · AMBIO · doi:10.1007/s13280-010-0134-0 · Cited by 508
Metadata
- Authors
- Stirling, A.
- Venue
- Science and citizens
- Publisher
- Zed Books Ltd
- Published
- 2005
- OpenAlex
- W1554541217
- Cited by
- 260
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 112.84
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5040/9781350222458.ch-015
- The paper
- Stirling, A. (2005). Opening up or closing down? Analysis, participation and power in the social appraisal of technology. Science and citizens. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350222458.ch-015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
