The Image Factory: Consumer Culture, Photography and the Visual Content Industry
Abstract
Quietly but implacably, powerful transnational corporations are gaining power over our visual world. A 'global, visual content industry' increasingly controls images supplied to advertisers, marketers and designers, yet so far the process has, paradoxically, evaded the public eye. This book is the first to expose the interior workings of the visual content industry, which produces approximately 70% of the images that define consumer cultures. The corporate acquisition of major photographic and film archives, as well as the digital rights to much of the worlds fine art, is having a profound effect on what we see. From stock photography to new technologies, this book powerfully engages with the historical and cultural issues relating to visual culture and new media. How has stock photography, the system of renting out ready-made images, transformed the role of marketing and advertising? What impact are digital technologies having on the practices of industry professionals? How have software programs such as Photoshop enabled professionals to play God with photographs and how does this influence our belief in the integrity of images? Combining original research on stock photography with a new theoretical take on the circulation of images in contemporary culture, The Image Factory provides a comprehensive and in-depth exploration of industrialized commercial photography, its uses and abuses.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital stock photography uses public images as resources or input to be worked on by anyone who pays for their exploit.
“Digital 'stock photography' uses public images as resources or 'input' to be worked on by anyone who pays for their exploit (Frosh, 2003).”
From Digital photography: communication, identity, memory (2008) · cites this paper as Frosh, 2003
Cultural theorists, semioticians and constructivists typically disregard psychological and cognitive studies in this area.
“Mutatis mutandis, when turning to cultural theorists for enlightenment, their disregard of psychological and cognitive studies in this area is rather remarkable; semioticians and constructivists typically analyze the intricacies of technological devices to connect them to social and cultural agency.8”
From Digital photography: communication, identity, memory (2008) · cites this paper as [8]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Digital photography: communication, identity, memory
van Dijck, J. (2008) · Visual Communication · doi:10.1177/1470357207084865 · Cited by 508 · see citing works
- Authors
- Frosh, P.
- Corresponding author
- Frosh, Paul
- ORCID
- Frosh, Paul
- Publisher
- Oxford International Publishers Ltd.
- Published
- 2003
- OpenAlex
- W7128718554
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Photography and Visual Culture
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Visual Arts and Performing Arts › Visual Culture and Art Theory
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Museology › Photographic and Visual Arts
- Keywords
- stock photography, multinational corporations, advertising and marketing, consumerism, photographic archives, digital rights, Adobe Photoshop, image integrity, visual culture, new media, circulation of images
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review