Cited by 1,300Literary Theory and Cultural HermeneuticsHermeneutics and Narrative IdentityNarrative Theory and Analysis

Validity in Interpretation

Hirsch , Jr., E. D.·1967·Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks

Abstract

“Here is a book that brings logic to the most unruly of disciplines, literary interpretation. Viewing this subject within the tradition of hermeneutics, Mr. Hirsch is able to trace its origins and development with brilliant insight. The result is a lucidly systemic and authoritative account of the premises and procedures applicable to the interpretation of a literary text. Mr. Hirsch has performed a monumental service thereby that of reinstating the credentials of objectivism and defining the limits of the aesthetics of truth. This study is a necessary took for anyone who wants to talk sense about literature.”—Virginia Quarterly Review By demonstrating the uniformity and universality of the principles of valid interpretation of verbal texts of any sort, this closely reasoned examination provides a theoretical foundation for a discipline that is fundamental to virtually all humanistic studies. It defines the grounds on which textual interpretation can claim to establish objective knowledge, defends that claim against such skeptical attitudes as historicism and psychologism, and shows that many confusions can be avoided if the distinctions between meaning and significance, interpretation and criticism are correctly understood.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5040/9781350928510

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Gadamer's view on how interpretation works is not universally accepted.

    “Gadamer's view on how interpretation works is not universally accepted.”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Hirsch, 1967

  • Hirsch disagrees, arguing that Gadamer confuses meaning (author's intent) with signification (reader's interpretation).

    “Hirsch (1967, p. 123) disagrees, arguing that Gadamer confuses meaning (author's intent) with signification (reader's interpretation)”

    From Real-time hermeneutics: meaning-making in ludonarrative digital games (2018) · cites this paper as Hirsch, 1967, p. 123

Authors
Hirsch, Jr.
Venue
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks
Published
1967
OpenAlex
W4300448215
Cited by
1,300
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 33 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 28 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 168 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 26 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 25 · 2012: 13
FWCI
96.20
Type
book
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Bloomsbury Publishing Plc eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Literary Theory and Cultural Hermeneutics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Narrative Theory and Analysis
Keywords
literary interpretation, hermeneutics, objectivism, validity of interpretation, historicism, psychologism, meaning and significance, philosophy of literature

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review