The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The coming technological singularity: How to survive in a post-human era
Open accessAbstract
The acceleration of technological progress has been the central feature of this century. I argue in this paper that we are on the edge of change comparable to the rise of human life on Earth. The precise cause of this change is the imminent creation by technology of entities with greater than human intelligence. There are several means by which science may achieve this breakthrough (and this is another reason for having confidence that the event will occur): (1) the development of computers that are 'awake' and superhumanly intelligent (to date, most controversy in the area of AI relates to whether we can create human equivalence in a machine. But if the answer is 'yes, we can', then there is little doubt that beings more intelligent can be constructed shortly thereafter); (2) large computer networks (and their associated users) may 'wake up' as a superhumanly intelligent entity; (3) computer/human interfaces may become so intimate that users may reasonably be considered superhumanly intelligent; and (4) biological science may find ways to improve upon the natural human intellect. The first three possibilities depend in large part on improvements in computer hardware. Progress in computer hardware has followed an amazingly steady curve in the last few decades. Based largely on this trend, I believe that the creation of greater than human intelligence will occur during the next thirty years.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Searle, J. R. (1980) · Behavioral and Brain Sciences · doi:10.1017/s0140525x00005756 · Cited by 6,954
The Emperor's New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and The Laws of Physics
Penrose, R., & Gardner, M. (1989) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198519737.001.0001 · Cited by 2,007
Speculations Concerning the First Ultraintelligent Machine
Good, I. J. (1966) · Advances in Computers · doi:10.1016/s0065-2458(08)60418-0 · Cited by 703
Regeneration microelectrode array for peripheral nerve recording and stimulation
Kovacs, G. T. A., Storment, C. W., & Rosen, J. M. (1992) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.256422 · Cited by 168
Cited by
The ethics of artificial intelligence
Bostrom, N., & Yudkowsky, E. (2014) · The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139046855.020 · Cited by 918
Two Bits: The Cultural Significance of Free Software
(2008) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.46-2158 · Cited by 709
Artificial Intelligence as a Positive and Negative Factor in Global Risk
Yudkowsky, E. (2008) · Global Catastrophic Risks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198570509.003.0021 · Cited by 431
The Philosophy of Transhumanism
More, M. (2013) · The Transhumanist Reader · doi:10.1002/9781118555927.ch1 · Cited by 441
Artificial Intelligence and Its Implications for Income Distribution and Unemployment
Korinek, A., & Stiglitz, J. (2017) · doi:10.3386/w24174 · Cited by 380
Metadata
- Authors
- Vinge, V.
- Venue
- Science Fiction Criticism
- Publisher
- Bloomsbury Academic
- Published
- 2017
- OpenAlex
- W1667758942
- Cited by
- 538
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 195.59
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The coming technological singularity: How to survive in a post-human era. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5040/9781474248655.0037
- The paper
- Vinge, V. (2017). The coming technological singularity: How to survive in a post-human era. Science Fiction Criticism. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781474248655.0037
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.