Cited by 8COVID-19 and Mental HealthHealthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutOccupational Health and Burnout

The Psychosocial and Interpersonal Impact of the SARS Epidemic on Chinese Health Professionals: Implications for Epidemics Including Ebola

Chan, Kit Ling, Chau, Wai Wai, Kuriansky, Judy, Dow, Emily A. A., Zinsou, Joel C., Leung, Janet, Kim, Sookyong·2016·The Psychosocial Aspects of a Deadly Epidemic

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5040/9798216002932.ch-021

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The psychological consequences of outbreaks remain largely unaddressed.

    “Unfortunately, the psychological ramifications due to an outbreak’s direct and indirect effects remain widely unaddressed (Chan et al., 2016; Tandon, 2020).”

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chan, K. L., Chau, W. W., Kuriansky, J., Dow, E. A. A., Zinsou, J. C., Leung, J., & Kim, S.
Venue
The Psychosocial Aspects of a Deadly Epidemic
Publisher
ABC-CLIO
Published
2016
Pages
287-322
OpenAlex
W4392987928
Cited by
8
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3
Type
other
Language
en
Open access
closed
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
SARS epidemic, healthcare workers, psychosocial impact, interpersonal influence, Ebola, epidemic preparedness, occupational stress

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review