The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Women of Classical Mythology: A Biographical Dictionary
Abstract
The first and only comprehensive biographical dictionary devoted to mythological women. Divinities, humans, female monsters and animals, hermaphrodites, and transsexuals are all here.Women of Classical Mythologyoffers unprecedented access to information on women largely neglected in reference works on Greek and Roman myth and gives a fresh look at the better-known figures. Each of the 2,600 entries places its subject both in the overall context of classical myth, and in the frame of reference of her better-known counterparts. For each figure there is a description of her particular contribution to folklore, and a list of the various poems, tragedies, epics, and other types of stories in which she plays a central role. In addition, the handy special index, "The Men in Their Lives," allows readers to locate a particular woman known primarily through her relations. The female characters in classical mythology often provide clues to genealogical, chronological, and historical puzzles. This book will be welcomed by classical scholars for the insights and relationships it reveals.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Sometimes she resembles the wild and terrifying Maenads, the women who follow Dionysus in a state of ecstasy and frenzy after they ceremonially leave the city (Bell 1991(Bell , 2878;;OCD s.v. maenads).”
From Medea: Greek myth and peculiar identity (2023) · cites this paper as Bell 1991
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Medea: Greek myth and peculiar identity
Plecas, T., & Djordjevic, A. (2023) · Glasnik Etnografskog instituta · doi:10.2298/gei2301045p
Metadata
- Authors
- Bell, R. E.
- Publisher
- ABC-CLIO
- Published
- 1991
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review