The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science
Abstract
The second edition of this innovative textbook illustrates research methods for library and information science, describing the most appropriate approaches to a question—and showing you what makes research successful. Written for the serious practicing librarian researcher and the LIS student, this volume fills the need for a guide focused specifically on information and library science research methods. By critically assessing existing studies from within library and information science, this book helps you acquire a deeper understanding of research methods so you will be able to design more effective studies yourself. Section one considers research questions most often asked in information and library science and explains how they arise from practice or theory. Section two covers a variety of research designs and the sampling issues associated with them, while sections three and four look at methods for collecting and analyzing data. Each chapter introduces a particular research method, points out its relative strengths and weaknesses, and provides a critique of two or more exemplary studies. For this second edition, three new chapters have been added, covering mixed methods, visual data collection methods, and social network analysis. The chapters on research diaries and transaction log analysis have been updated, and updated examples are provided in more than a dozen other chapters as well.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Where is the “theory” within the field of educational technology research?
Hew, K. F., Lan, M., Tang, Y., Jia, C., & Lo, C. K. (2019) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/bjet.12770 · Cited by 264
Safety vs. Surveillance: What Children Have to Say about Mobile Apps for Parental Control
Ghosh, A. K., Badillo-Urquiola, K., Guha, S., LaViola Jr, J. J., & Wisniewski, P. J. (2018) · Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems · doi:10.1145/3173574.3173698 · Cited by 152
Gender representation in the public sector schools textbooks of Pakistan
Ullah, H., & Skelton, C. (2013) · Educational Studies · doi:10.1080/03055698.2012.702892 · Cited by 141
The Role of Pedagogical Mentoring in Virtual Exchange
O'Dowd, R., Sauro, S., & Spector‐Cohen, E. (2020) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.543 · Cited by 121
Student privacy self-management: implications for learning analytics
Prinsloo, P., & Slade, S. (2015) · Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Learning Analytics And Knowledge · doi:10.1145/2723576.2723585 · Cited by 119
Metadata
- Venue
- Libraries Unlimited eBooks
- Publisher
- Libraries Unlimited
- Published
- 2016
- OpenAlex
- W1526712941
- Cited by
- 1,107
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 63.00
- Type
- book
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5040/9798400613739
- The paper
- Applications of Social Research Methods to Questions in Information and Library Science. (2016). Libraries Unlimited eBooks. https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400613739
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.