The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Renewing Destruction: Wind Energy Development, Conflict and Resistance in a Latin American Context
Abstract
Renewing Destruction examines how wind energy projects impact people and their environments. Wind energy development, in Mexico and most countries, fall into a ‘roll out’ neoliberal strategy that is justified by climate change mitigation programs that are continuing a process of land and wind resources grabbing for profit. The result has been an exaggeration of pre-existing problems in communities around land, income-inequality, local politics and, contrary to public relations stories, is devastating traditional livelihoods and socio-ecological relationships. Exacerbating pre-existing social and material problems in surrounding towns, wind energy development is placing greater stress on semi-subsistence communities, marginalizing Indigenous traditions and indirectly resulting in the displacement and migration of people into urban centers. Based on intensive fieldwork with local groups in Oaxaca, Mexico, this book provides an in-depth study, demonstrating the complications and problems that emerge with the current regime of ‘sustainable development’ and wind energy projects in Mexico, which has wider lessons to be drawn for other regions and countries. Put simply, the book reveals a tragic reality that calls into question the marketed hopes of the green economy and the current method of climate change mitigation. It shows the variegated impacts and issues associated with building wind energy parks, which extends to recognizing the destructive effects on Indigenous cultures and practices in the region. The book, however, highlights what to consider or, more importantly, what to avoid if one is working with industrial-scale wind energy systems.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The theory of fossil capital, which prioritizes climate, sidesteps the distributional consequences of alternative energy installations (Dunlap, 2019;Franquesa & Bartolome, 2018;Stock & Birkenholtz, 2021), and mineral sourcing, whose costs and benefits will fall upon imperialist and capitalist lines of power and powerlessness.”
From Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet (2023) · cites this paper as Dunlap, 2019
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Theories of Political Ecology: Monopoly Capital Against People and the Planet
Ajl, M. (2023) · Agrarian South: Journal of Political Economy · doi:10.1177/22779760221145232 · Cited by 48
Metadata
- Authors
- Dunlap, A. A.
- Published
- 2019
- Cited by
- 35
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review