The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Memory Wars and Identity Construction: Return of the Suppressed as Afterlife of Partition under the Hindutva Rule in India
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bhadraloks and Enmity in Selected Bengal Partition Narratives
Chakraborty, N. (2024) · Journal of Migration Affairs · doi:10.36931/jma.2024.6.1-2.57-74
Metadata
- Authors
- Sequeira, S.
- Corresponding author
- Sequeira, Samuel
- Venue
- Partitions and Their Afterlives
- Published
- 2019
- Pages
- 128-156
- OpenAlex
- W4410668057
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- Type
- other
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, History, Trauma, Identity
- Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History › Memory, violence, and history
- Keywords
- memory wars, identity construction, collective memory, memory politics, national identity
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
