The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Diagnosis and prediction of periodontally compromised teeth using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm
Open accessAbstract
PURPOSE: The aim of the current study was to develop a computer-assisted detection system based on a deep convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm and to evaluate the potential usefulness and accuracy of this system for the diagnosis and prediction of periodontally compromised teeth (PCT). METHODS: Combining pretrained deep CNN architecture and a self-trained network, periapical radiographic images were used to determine the optimal CNN algorithm and weights. The diagnostic and predictive accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, area under the ROC curve, confusion matrix, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using our deep CNN algorithm, based on a Keras framework in Python. RESULTS: The periapical radiographic dataset was split into training (n=1,044), validation (n=348), and test (n=348) datasets. With the deep learning algorithm, the diagnostic accuracy for PCT was 81.0% for premolars and 76.7% for molars. Using 64 premolars and 64 molars that were clinically diagnosed as severe PCT, the accuracy of predicting extraction was 82.8% (95% CI, 70.1%-91.2%) for premolars and 73.4% (95% CI, 59.9%-84.0%) for molars. CONCLUSIONS: We demonstrated that the deep CNN algorithm was useful for assessing the diagnosis and predictability of PCT. Therefore, with further optimization of the PCT dataset and improvements in the algorithm, a computer-aided detection system can be expected to become an effective and efficient method of diagnosing and predicting PCT.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rethinking the Inception Architecture for Computer Vision
Szegedy, C., Vanhoucke, V., Ioffe, S., Shlens, J., & Wojna, Z. (2016) · 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) · doi:10.1109/cvpr.2016.308 · Cited by 32,138
A survey on deep learning in medical image analysis
Litjens, G., Kooi, T., Bejnordi, B. E., Setio, A. A. A., Ciompi, F., Ghafoorian, M., van der Laak, J. A. W. M., van Ginneken, B., & Sánchez, C. I. (2017) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2017.07.005 · Cited by 15,332
Dermatologist-level classification of skin cancer with deep neural networks
Esteva, A., Kuprel, B., Novoa, R. A., Ko, J., Swetter, S. M., Blau, H. M., & Thrun, S. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature21056 · Cited by 14,362
Shin, H.-C., Roth, H. R., Gao, M., Lu, L., Xu, Z., Nogues, I., Yao, J., Mollura, D., & Summers, R. M. (2016) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/tmi.2016.2528162 · Cited by 5,759
Lakhani, P., & Sundaram, B. (2017) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2017162326 · Cited by 1,775
Diagnostic Accuracy of Digital Screening Mammography With and Without Computer-Aided Detection
Lehman, C. D., Wellman, R. D., Buist, D. S. M., Kerlikowske, K., Tosteson, A. N. A., & Miglioretti, D. L. (2015) · JAMA Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.5231 · Cited by 678
Cited by
Khanagar, S. B., Al-ehaideb, A., Maganur, P. C., Vishwanathaiah, S., Patil, S., Baeshen, H. A., Sarode, S. C., & Bhandi, S. (2021) · Journal of Dental Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.jds.2020.06.019 · Cited by 676
A scoping review of transfer learning research on medical image analysis using ImageNet
Morid, M. A., Borjali, A., & Del Fiol, G. (2021) · Computers in Biology and Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.compbiomed.2020.104115 · Cited by 508
Deep Learning for the Radiographic Detection of Apical Lesions
Ekert, T., Krois, J., Meinhold, L., Elhennawy, K., Emara, R., Golla, T., & Schwendicke, F. (2019) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2019.03.016 · Cited by 384
Artificial intelligence in dentistry-a review
Ding, H., Wu, J., Zhao, W., Matinlinna, J. P., Burrow, M. F., & Tsoi, J. K. H. (2023) · Frontiers in Dental Medicine · doi:10.3389/fdmed.2023.1085251 · Cited by 297
Samaranayake, L., Tuygunov, N., Schwendicke, F., Osathanon, T., Khurshid, Z., Boymuradov, S. A., & Cahyanto, A. (2025) · International Dental Journal · doi:10.1016/j.identj.2025.02.005 · Cited by 240
Metadata
- Authors
- Lee, J.-H., Kim, D.-H., Jeong, S.-N., & Choi, S.-H.
- Venue
- Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science
- Publisher
- XMLink
- Published
- 2018
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 114
- ISSN
- 2093-2278 (ISSN-L)
- 2093-2286
- OpenAlex
- W2800706558
- Cited by
- 502
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 37.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Diagnosis and prediction of periodontally compromised teeth using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5051/jpis.2018.48.2.114
- The paper
- Lee, J.-H., Kim, D.-H., Jeong, S.-N., & Choi, S.-H. (2018). Diagnosis and prediction of periodontally compromised teeth using a deep learning-based convolutional neural network algorithm. Journal of Periodontal & Implant Science. https://doi.org/10.5051/jpis.2018.48.2.114
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.