Cited by 49Telemedicine and Telehealth ImplementationDigital Imaging in MedicineCutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management

Using cellphones for teledermatology, a preliminary study

Open access
Chung, Pil, Yu, Thomas, Scheinfeld, Noah·2007·Dermatology Online Journal

Abstract

We compared live and instantaneous digital image examination of hospitalized dermatology consultation patients and to assess the reliability and the practicality of a teledermatology system equipped with the cellular phone cameras. A dermatology resident examined ten hospitalized dermatology consultation patients. Then a medical student took digital pictures of these lesions from consenting patients with a cell phone camera. The pictures were forwarded to a supervising dermatologist who was able to review them using the identical phone. The differential diagnoses given by the resident and the supervising dermatologist were recorded. Identifiable facial images were never taken. The concordance of the diagnoses between resident and off site attending was 80 percent (8/10 cases) when a diagnosis could be made remotely. In one case no diagnosis could be made because of poor photographic quality and small screen and in one case the attending diagnosis was incorrect. The practicality of this cellular phone camera teledermatology system depended on the Sprint wireless network, which was sometimes unreliable. Cellular phones with cameras offer a means to deliver bedside supervision of dermatology residents but transmission issues, small screen size, and photographic quality complicate their use.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5070/d31c0116kj

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Still being checked.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chung, P., Yu, T., & Scheinfeld, N.
Affiliations
St. Luke's-Roosevelt Hospital Center (US)
Venue
Dermatology Online Journal
Published
2007
Volume
13
Issue
3
Pages
2-2
ISSN
1087-2108 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W42071188
Cited by
49
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • Dermatology Online Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Telemedicine and Telehealth Implementation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Digital Imaging in Medicine
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Keywords
teledermatology, smartphone camera, remote diagnosis, dermatology residents, hospitalized patients, differential diagnosis, diagnostic agreement, wireless network reliability, photographic quality, telemedicine
MeSH terms
Biopsy, Dermatology, Diagnosis, Differential, Equipment Design, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Photography, Skin Diseases, Video Recording, Reproducibility of Results, Telepathology, Remote Consultation, Cell Phone

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review