The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems
Open accessAbstract
Review: Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems By Gretchen C. Daily Reviewed by Sean T. O'Brien Florida Department of Environmental Protection Daily, Gretchen C. Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Washington, DC: Island Press, 1997. 392 p. US$24.95 paper ISBN: 1-55963-475-8. Recycled, acid-free paper. Recently, I commented on the response made by the New Jersey chapter of a national conservation group to a state forestry plan. Fortunately, I had just finished reading Nature's Services and had a broadened understanding of the value of natural ecosystems to our state, and human society in general. Edited by Gretchen Daily, the Bing Interdisciplinary Research Scientist in the Department of Biological Sciences at Stanford University, Nature's Services includes 20 chapters by well-known scientists on a range of topics organized around the theme of the value of services provided by natural ecosystems to humanity. Understandably, and usefully, contributors to Nature's Services make economic arguments for conservation and tend to downplay moral and aesthetic arguments. In general, the value of ecosystems can be divided into consumptive and nonconsumptive uses. For example, consumptive uses for forests include logging and hunting; nonconsumptive uses include bird watching, appreciation of the existence of an ecosystem, flood control, and soil conservation. While consumptive uses can be valued directly based on market prices, it is harder to assign value to nonconsumptive uses. It is difficult to present nonconsumptive uses objectively in arguments about conservation of ecosystems. It is this difficulty that led to the contributors' lament [of] the near total lack of public appreciation of societal dependence upon natural ecosystems (p. xv). Given this, I was surprised that Nature's Services misses the mark, though not too widely, in its self-stated goal ...to characterize the ways in which earth's natural ecosystems confer benefits on humanity, to make a preliminary assessment of their value, and to report this in a manner widely accessible to an educated audience (p. 2) Although the first two goals are admirably addressed, they are
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The dimensions of soil security
McBratney, A., Field, D. J., & Koch, A. (2014) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2013.08.013 · Cited by 867
Escobedo, F. J., Giannico, V., Jim, C. Y., Sanesi, G., & Lafortezza, R. (2019) · Urban Forestry & Urban Greening · doi:10.1016/j.ufug.2018.02.011 · Cited by 471
Economic Value of Biological Control in Integrated Pest Management of Managed Plant Systems
Naranjo, S. E., Ellsworth, P. C., & Frisvold, G. B. (2015) · Annual Review of Entomology · doi:10.1146/annurev-ento-010814-021005 · Cited by 406
The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services
Corbera, E., Brown, K., & Adger, W. N. (2007) · Development and Change · doi:10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x · Cited by 373
Metadata
- Authors
- O'Brien, S. T.
- Venue
- Electronic Green Journal
- Publisher
- California Digital Library (CDL)
- Published
- 1998-06-01
- Volume
- 1
- Issue
- 8
- ISSN
- 1076-7975 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1500210162
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5070/g31810307
- The paper
- O'Brien, S. T. (1998). Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems. Electronic Green Journal. https://doi.org/10.5070/g31810307
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.