The DOI matches its Crossref record; 59 of the 59 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services
Abstract
Markets for ecosystem services are being promoted across the developing world, amidst claims that the provision of economic incentives is vital to bring about resource conservation. This article argues that equity and legitimacy are also critical dimensions in the design and implementation of such markets, if social development goals beyond economic gains are to be achieved. The article examines this issue by focusing on two communities involved in a project for carbon sequestration services of forests in the state of Chiapas, Mexico. The perceived legitimacy of the activities and the distribution of economic outcomes and project‐related information are found to be mediated by organizational allegiances and the history of social relations regarding access to property and forest resources. Political affiliation determines the project's legitimacy, while the poorest farmers and women have been excluded from project design and implementation. The authors argue that pitfalls such as these contribute to reinforcing existing power structures, inequities and vulnerabilities, and suggest that this is a product of the nature of emerging markets. Markets for ecosystem services are, in effect, limited in promoting more legitimate forms of decision making and a more equitable distribution of their outcomes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Ostrom, E. (1990) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511807763 · Cited by 20,653
Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action
Field, B. C., & Ostrom, E. (1992) · Land Economics · doi:10.2307/3146384 · Cited by 18,859
A Theory of Justice: Original Edition
Rawls, J. (1971) · doi:10.4159/9780674042605 · Cited by 9,496
Nature's Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems
Pharo, E., & Daily, G. C. (1998) · The Bryologist · doi:10.2307/3244191 · Cited by 5,261
The Struggle to Govern the Commons
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P. C. (2003) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1091015 · Cited by 4,209
Ecosystems and human well-being: a framework for assessment
(2004) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.41-4645 · Cited by 2,846
Spheres of Justice: A Defense of Pluralism and Equality.
Daniels, N., & Walzer, M. (1985) · The Philosophical Review · doi:10.2307/2184729 · Cited by 2,666
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
(2012) · Strategic Environmental Assessment · doi:10.4324/9781849772631-19 · Cited by 2,617
Justice interruptus: critical reflections on the "postsocialist" condition
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.34-6523 · Cited by 2,522
Ecosystems and Human well-being
Butler, C. D., Chambers, R., Chopra, K., Dasgupta, P. S., Duraiappah, A. K., Kumar, P., McMichael, A. J., & Wells, J. (2003) · Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) · Cited by 1,917
Cited by
Green Grabbing: a new appropriation of nature?
Fairhead, J., Leach, M., & Scoones, I. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.671770 · Cited by 1,928
The new enclosures: critical perspectives on corporate land deals
White, B., Borras Jr., S. M., Hall, R., Scoones, I., & Wolford, W. (2012) · The Journal of Peasant Studies · doi:10.1080/03066150.2012.691879 · Cited by 913
Corbera, E., Soberanis, C. G., & Brown, K. (2009) · Ecological Economics · doi:10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.06.008 · Cited by 357
Self-citationAnguelovski, I., Brand, A. L., Connolly, J. J. T., Corbera, E., Kotsila, P., Steil, J., Garcia-Lamarca, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Cole, H., Baró, F., et al. (2020) · Annals of the American Association of Geographers · doi:10.1080/24694452.2020.1740579 · Cited by 309
Self-citationGoverning the Provision of Ecosystem Services
(2013) · Studies in Ecological Economics · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-5176-7 · Cited by 97
Metadata
- Authors
- Corbera, E., Brown, K., & Adger, W. N.
- Venue
- Development and Change
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2007-07
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 587-613
- ISSN
- 0012-155X (ISSN-L)
- 1467-7660
- OpenAlex
- W2103975681
- Cited by
- 373
- References
- 59
- FWCI
- 10.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x
- The paper
- Corbera, E., Brown, K., & Adger, W. N. (2007). The Equity and Legitimacy of Markets for Ecosystem Services. Development and Change. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7660.2007.00425.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.