Cited by 17Liver Diseases and ImmunityPediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and TreatmentsInflammatory Bowel Disease

A meta-analysis of ursodeoxycholic acid therapy versus combination therapy with corticosteroids for PBC-AIH-overlap syndrome: evidence from 97 monotherapy and 117 combinations

Open access
Zhang, Huawei, Li, Sainan, Yang, Jing, Zheng, Yuanyuan, Wang, Jianrong, Lu, Wenxia, Zhou, Yuqing, Yin, Qin +2 more·2015·Gastroenterology Review

Abstract

In this study, a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials that compared ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) monotherapy with therapies combining UDCA and corticosteroids was performed. We found that combination therapy with UDCA and corticosteroids was more effective than UDCA monotherapy for primary biliary cirrhosis-autoimmune hepatitis-overlap syndrome.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5114/pg.2015.51187

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Meta-analysis of existing bezafibrate randomised clinical trials shows no significant improvement in patient survival compared with UDCA monotherapy, although liver transplantation and liver-related death were not presented as clinical endpoints.

    “As such, meta-analysis of existing bezafibrate randomised clinical trials show no significant improvement in patient survival compared with UDCA monotherapy,170 although liver transplantation and liver-related death were not presented as clinical endpoints.”

    From The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines (2018) · cites this paper as [170]

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 1 partially supported, 1 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Budesonide in combination with UDCA improves survival in comparison to UDCA monotherapy and is associated with fewer side effects than other immunosuppressive regimes.

    “There is evidence to support the use of budesonide in combination with UDCA, an approach which improves survival in comparison to UDCA monotherapy and is associated with fewer side effects than other immunosuppressive regimes.170”

    From The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines (2018) · cites this paper as [170]

    The Discussion (page unavailable) says UDCA plus corticosteroids did not significantly improve mortality or death/liver transplantation compared with UDCA alone, contrary to the claimed survival benefit. It mentions budesonide only as a possible alternative treatment; the analysis does not establish a survival benefit for UDCA plus budesonide or compare its side effects with other immunosuppressive regimens. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Meta-analysis supports the use of combination of immunosuppressive therapy and UDCA in patients with true overlap.

    “Meta-analysis supports the use of combination of immunosuppressive therapy and UDCA in patients with true overlap, but the challenges of disease classification impact directly on the value of such meta-analyses per se.170”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 35 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [17]Chazouilleres O Wendum D Serfaty L Primary biliary cirrhosis-autoimmunehepatitis overlap syndrome: clinical features and response to therapy Hepatology 1998 28 296 301 9695990
  2. [24]Manns MP Czaja AJ Gorham JD Diagnosis and management of autoimmune hepatitis Hepatology 2010 51 2193 213 20513004

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, H., Li, S., Yang, J., Zheng, Y., Wang, J., Lu, W., Zhou, Y., Yin, Q., Zhu, R., & Guo, C.
Affiliations
Tongji University (CN)
Corresponding author
Guo, Chuanyong
Venue
Gastroenterology Review
Published
2015
Volume
3
Issue
3
Pages
148-155
ISSN
1895-5770 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1951557360
Cited by
17
References
35
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-sa
Locations
  • Gastroenterology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (81270515)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver Diseases and Immunity
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Pediatric Hepatobiliary Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Inflammatory Bowel Disease
Keywords
ursodeoxycholic acid, corticosteroids, combination therapy, primary biliary cirrhosis, autoimmune hepatitis, PBC-AIH overlap syndrome, monotherapy, treatment efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review