Cited by 3Educational Technology and E-LearningTechnology-Enhanced Education StudiesOnline and Blended Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Tour of the Student's E-Learning Puddle

Open access
Mitha, Vidhu·2018·Advanced Computing: An International Journal

Abstract

E-learning has revolutionized our realm in more than just a listable number of ways.But it took a paradigm shift when it entered the threshold of the varsity system.With the prevailing spoon-feeding era, are the students really industry ready?We answer that by confirming afact: web-based learning has become the oxygen of freshers in the IT Industry instead of the traditionallearning done through graduation.Furthermore, are university enforced e-learning assessment systems a true representation of a student's proficiency?This paper is a peep into what web-based e-learning systems are to a student of today's world, by giving an overview of university-level e-learning in India deploying an example from SRM University's organizational framework.It assesses a key e-learning trend, the implementation of which bridges the gap between universities and the industry.It is proposed to provide constructive feedback to the e-learning community and shine some light on areas of scope for future developments.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5121/acij.2018.9301

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Joel A. Mejia, Wade Goodridge and Christopher Green, (2015) "Using web-based learning logs to analyse students' conceptual understanding of truss analysis in an engineering statics course", IEEE 2014: Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 3

Metadata

Authors
Mitha, V.
Affiliations
SRM Institute of Science and Technology (IN)
Corresponding author
Mitha, Vidhu
Venue
Advanced Computing: An International Journal
Published
2018-05-30
Volume
9
Issue
3
Pages
01-08
ISSN
  • 2229-6727 (ISSN-L)
  • 2229-726X
OpenAlex
W2962721700
Cited by
3
References
6
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
0.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Advanced Computing An International Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Educational Technology and E-Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Technology-Enhanced Education Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
Keywords
online learning, web-based learning, industry-academia gap, IT industry, Indian higher education

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review