The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust
Abstract
Accepted for publication in Comparative Politics Authors ’ names are in alphabetical order and they share equal responsibility for the article 2 The purpose of this article is to present an alternative theory on the generation of social capital. In the discussion about the sources of social capital it has been stressed that generalized trust is built up by the citizens themselves through a culture that permeates the networks and organizations of civil society. Since this approach has run into conceptual problems and has produced only mixed empirical evidence, we like to highlight instead how social capital is embedded in and linked to formal political and legal institutions. Not all political institutions matter equally, however. In fact, we argue that trust thrives most in societies with effective, impartial and fair street-level bureaucracies. The article presents the causal mechanism between these institutional characteristics and generalized trust, and illustrates its validity in a cross-national context.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cites
Civil Society and the Collapse of the Weimar Republic
Berman, S. (1997) · World Politics · doi:10.1353/wp.1997.0008 · Cited by 1,108 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How General Is Trust in “Most People”? Solving the Radius of Trust Problem
Delhey, J., Newton, K., & Welzel, C. (2011) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122411420817 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Van Der Waal, J., De Koster, W., & Van Oorschot, W. (2013) · Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice · doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.785147 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Vårheim, A. (2011) · Library & Information Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.lisr.2010.04.005 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Trust in Libraries and Trust in Most People: Social Capital Creation in the Public Library
Vårheim, A. (2014) · The Library Quarterly · doi:10.1086/676487 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Questioning the New Liberal Dilemma: Immigrants, Social Networks, and Institutional Fairness
Kumlin, S., & Rothstein, B. (2010) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.5129/001041510x12911363510394 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Self-citationViolent conflicts and state capacity: Evidence from Sub-Saharan Africa
Babajide, A., Ahmad, A. H., & Coleman, S. (2021) · Journal of Government and Economics · doi:10.1016/j.jge.2021.100019 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
Horne, C. M. (2014) · Europe-Asia Studies · doi:10.1080/09668136.2014.882620 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Authors
- Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D.
- Affiliations
- University of Gothenburg (SE)
- McGill University (CA)
- ORCID
- Stolle, Dietlind
- Venue
- Comparative Politics
- Publisher
- Comparative Politics CUNY
- Published
- 2008-07-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 441-459
- ISSN
- 0010-4159 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-6227
- OpenAlex
- W2327642559
- Cited by
- 1,189
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 109 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
- FWCI
- 57.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Politics (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
- Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
- Keywords
- social capital, generalized trust, institutional theory, street-level bureaucracy, political institutions, legal institutions, civil society, institutional effectiveness, impartiality, fairness, cross-national comparison
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review