Cited by 1,189Social Capital and NetworksSocial Policy and Reform StudiesPublic Policy and Administration Research

The State and Social Capital: An Institutional Theory of Generalized Trust

Rothstein, Bo, Stolle, Dietlind·2008·Comparative Politics

Abstract

Accepted for publication in Comparative Politics Authors ’ names are in alphabetical order and they share equal responsibility for the article 2 The purpose of this article is to present an alternative theory on the generation of social capital. In the discussion about the sources of social capital it has been stressed that generalized trust is built up by the citizens themselves through a culture that permeates the networks and organizations of civil society. Since this approach has run into conceptual problems and has produced only mixed empirical evidence, we like to highlight instead how social capital is embedded in and linked to formal political and legal institutions. Not all political institutions matter equally, however. In fact, we argue that trust thrives most in societies with effective, impartial and fair street-level bureaucracies. The article presents the causal mechanism between these institutional characteristics and generalized trust, and illustrates its validity in a cross-national context.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5129/001041508x12911362383354

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D.
Affiliations
  • University of Gothenburg (SE)
  • McGill University (CA)
Venue
Comparative Politics
Published
2008-07-01
Volume
40
Issue
4
Pages
441-459
ISSN
  • 0010-4159 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-6227
OpenAlex
W2327642559
Cited by
1,189
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 109 · 2025: 106 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 115 · 2022: 134 · 2021: 82 · 2020: 89 · 2019: 73 · 2018: 76 · 2017: 53 · 2016: 45 · 2015: 43 · 2014: 42 · 2013: 33 · 2012: 28
FWCI
57.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Politics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Capital and Networks
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Social Policy and Reform Studies
  • Social Sciences › Public Administration › Public Policy and Administration Research
Keywords
social capital, generalized trust, institutional theory, street-level bureaucracy, political institutions, legal institutions, civil society, institutional effectiveness, impartiality, fairness, cross-national comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review