The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Regime Legacies and Levels of Democracy: Evidence from Latin America
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The situation in Bulgaria, Hungary and Slovakia was very similar to Romania.
“The situation in Bulgaria,76 Hungary77 and Slovakia78 was very similar.”
From Purging the Judiciary After a Transition: Between a Rock and a Hard Place (2025) · cites this paper as [78]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Inequality and Regime Change: Democratic Transitions and the Stability of Democratic Rule
HAGGARD, S., & KAUFMAN, R. R. (2012) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055412000287 · Cited by 300
Purging the Judiciary After a Transition: Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Šipulová, K., & Kosař, D. (2025) · Hague Journal on the Rule of Law · doi:10.1007/s40803-024-00201-y · Cited by 6
Metadata
- Authors
- Pérez-Liñán, A., & Mainwaring, S.
- ORCID
- Mainwaring, Scott
- Venue
- Comparative Politics
- Publisher
- Comparative Politics CUNY
- Published
- 2013-07-01
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 379-397
- ISSN
- 0010-4159 (ISSN-L)
- 2151-6227
- OpenAlex
- W2066397362
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 12.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Comparative Politics (publishedVersion)
- D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
- Keywords
- democratic consolidation, democratic backsliding, Latin America, political regimes
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review