Cited by 71Political Conflict and GovernancePolitics and Society in Latin AmericaPolitical Dynamics in Latin America

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Regime Legacies and Levels of Democracy: Evidence from Latin America

Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal, Mainwaring, Scott·2013·Comparative Politics

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5129/001041513x13815259182785

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pérez-Liñán, A., & Mainwaring, S.
Venue
Comparative Politics
Published
2013-07-01
Volume
45
Issue
4
Pages
379-397
ISSN
  • 0010-4159 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-6227
OpenAlex
W2066397362
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
12.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Comparative Politics (publishedVersion)
  • D-Scholarship@Pitt (University of Pittsburgh) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Political Conflict and Governance
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Politics and Society in Latin America
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Dynamics in Latin America
Keywords
democratic consolidation, democratic backsliding, Latin America, political regimes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review