Cited by 76Middle East and Rwanda ConflictsPolitical and Social IssuesMiddle East Politics and Society

Unexpected Brokers of Mobilization: Contingency and Networks in the 2011 Egyptian Uprising

Clarke, Killian·2014·Comparative Politics

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5129/001041514812522770

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • When dissidents at the edges of different networks coordinate collectively, they can activate large swaths of society.

    “And, when dissidents at the edges of different networks coordinate collectively, they can activate large swaths of society (Clarke 2014).”

    From Coordinated Dis-Coordination (2024) · cites this paper as Clarke 2014

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clarke, K.
Corresponding author
Clarke, Killian
Venue
Comparative Politics
Published
2014-07-01
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
379-397
ISSN
  • 0010-4159 (ISSN-L)
  • 2151-6227
OpenAlex
W2335275835
Cited by
76
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
9.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Comparative Politics (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political and Social Issues
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East Politics and Society
Keywords
Egyptian revolution, Arab Spring, social mobilization, contingency, social networks, protest networks

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review