Launching Revolution: Social Media and the Egyptian Uprising’s First Movers
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Drawing on evidence from the 2011 Egyptian uprising, this article demonstrates how the use of two social media platforms – Facebook and Twitter – contributed to a discrete mobilizational outcome: the staging of a successful first protest in a revolutionary cascade, referred to here as ‘first-mover mobilization’. Specifically, it argues that these two platforms facilitated the staging of a large, nationwide and seemingly leaderless protest on 25 January 2011, which signaled to hesitant but sympathetic Egyptians that a revolution might be in the making. It draws on qualitative and quantitative evidence, including interviews, social media data and surveys, to analyze three mechanisms that linked these platforms to the success of the January 25 protest: (1) protester recruitment, (2) protest planning and coordination, and (3) live updating about protest logistics. The article not only contributes to debates about the role of the Internet in the Arab Spring and other recent waves of mobilization, but also demonstrates how scholarship on the Internet in politics might move toward making more discrete, empirically grounded causal claims.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
How Censorship in China Allows Government Criticism but Silences Collective Expression
KING, G., PAN, J., & ROBERTS, M. E. (2013) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055413000014 · Cited by 2,415 · see citing works
Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. (2013) · doi:10.3998/mpub.2556282 · Cited by 1,140 · see citing works
Process-Tracing Methods: Foundations and Guidelines
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.51-1711 · Cited by 921 · cited 1× · see citing works
“See, for example, Elster (1998), Tilly (2001), Falleti and Lynch (2009), Gerring (2010), Waldner (2012), Beach and Pedersen (2013), Bennett and Checkel (2014). conducted with thirty-three Egyptian activists in the summer of 2011 and the spring of 2017,12 scraped Twitter data associated with the…”
BackgroundProcess Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool
(2014) · Cambridge University Press · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139858472 · Cited by 495 · see citing works
After Egypt: The Limits and Promise of Online Challenges to the Authoritarian Arab State
Lynch, M. (2011) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592711000910 · Cited by 388 · see citing works
The Consequences of the Internet for Politics
Farrell, H. (2012) · Annual Review of Political Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-polisci-030810-110815 · Cited by 387 · cited 2× · see citing works
“We agree with Henry Farrell, who has argued in a review of this literature that ‘one should disaggregate [the Internet] into more discrete phenomena, allowing scholars to ask research questions that they have some hope, however faint, of answering’ (Farrell 2012, 36).”
BackgroundThe Arab Spring: Why the Surprising Similarities with the Revolutionary Wave of 1848?
Weyland, K. (2012) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592712002873 · Cited by 333 · cited 1× · see citing works
“Indeed, some scholars have noted that the activists who organized early protests during the Arab Spring were noteworthy for their courage and commitment (Lynch 2011; Weyland 2012).”
BackgroundGerring, J. (2010) · Comparative Political Studies · doi:10.1177/0010414010376911 · Cited by 279 · see citing works
Process Tracing and Causal Mechanisms
Waldner, D. (2012) · Oxford Handbooks Online · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195392753.013.0004 · Cited by 131 · see citing works
Unexpected Brokers of Mobilization: Contingency and Networks in the 2011 Egyptian Uprising
Clarke, K. (2014) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.5129/001041514812522770 · Cited by 76 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Online repression and tactical evasion: evidence from the 2020 Day of Anger protests in Egypt
Lutscher, P. M., & Ketchley, N. (2023) · Democratization · doi:10.1080/13510347.2022.2140798 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
HASSAN, M. (2024) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055423000291 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
“…and especially many-to-many platforms like Twitter and Facebook, can facilitate the quick and public dissemination of information about anticipated or ongoing collective action (Christensen and Garfias 2018; Clarke and Kocak 2019; Enikolopov, Makarine, and Petrova 2020; Steinert-Threlkeld 2017).”
Background
- Authors
- Clarke, K., & Kocak, K.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- ORCID
- Clarke, Killian
- Venue
- British Journal of Political Science
- Publisher
- Cambridge University Press (CUP)
- Published
- 2018-12-04
- Volume
- 50
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 1025-1045
- ISSN
- 0007-1234 (ISSN-L)
- 1469-2112
- OpenAlex
- W2902347621
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 11
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 10.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- British Journal of Political Science (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political and Social Issues
- Keywords
- Egyptian revolution, Arab Spring, social media, Facebook, Twitter, protest coordination, internet and politics, online mobilization
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review