Cited by 2

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Drawing the line on pain

Merker, Bjorn·2016·Animal Sentience

Abstract

The structure of Key's (2016) argument that fish do not feel pain is flawed, betraying a fundamental lack of understanding of the nature of feelings and their role in the brain's functional division of labor. The evidence Key marshals in support of his premature commitment to an exclusively corticocentric view of consciousness in humans is plagued by repeated failures of scholarship.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.51291/2377-7478.1062

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Gray, C. M. and Singer, W. (1989). Stimulus-specific neuronal oscillations in orientation columns of cat visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 86, 1698-1702.
  2. Kirschfeld, K. (1992). Oscillations in the insect brain: do they correspond to the cortical gamma- waves of vertebrates? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 89, 4764-4768.
  3. Lashley, K. S. (1951). The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.), Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior (pp. 112-146). New York: Wiley.
  4. McFarland, D. J. and Sibly, R. M. (1975). The behavioural final common path. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society (London) B 270, 265-93.
  5. Pereira, Jr. and D. Lehmann (Eds.), The Unity of Mind, Brain and World: Current Perspectives on a Science of Consciousness (pp. 7-42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  6. Morsella, E. (2005) The function of phenomenal states: Supramodular interaction theory. Psychological Review 112, 1000-1021.
  7. Sibly, R. and McFarland, D. (1974). A state-space approach to motivation. In D. J. McFarland (Ed.), Motivational Control Systems Analysis (pp. 213-250). London: Academic Press.
  8. Singer, W. and Gray, C. M. (1995). Visual feature integration and the temporal correlation hypothesis. Annual Review of Neuroscience 18, 555-586.
  9. Sneddon, L. U. (2015). Pain in aquatic animals. The Journal of Experimental Biology 218, 967-976.
  10. Tononi, G. and Koch, C. (2015). Consciousness: here, there and everywhere? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 370(1668), 20140167.
  11. Van Dongen, P. A. M. (1998). Brain size in vertebrates. In R. Nieuwenhuys, H. J. ten Donkelaar and C. Nicholson (Eds.), The Central Nervous System of Vertebrates (Vol. 3, pp. 2099-2123). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  12. Woods, J. W. (1964). Behavior of chronic decerebrate rats. Journal of Neurophysiology 4, 635- 644.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Merker, B.
Affiliations
retired, no institutional affiliation
Venue
Animal Sentience
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
1
Issue
3
ISSN
2377-7478
Cited by
2
References
4
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review