Consciousness of octopuses—on their own terms
Open accessAbstract
Because cephalopods are so different from the vertebrate lineage, their possible consciousness must be assessed on the basis of their heritage and abilities. Cephalopods have evolved in water, a denser medium than air, and their perception is adapted to it. They have inherited the molluscan mantle cavity and hydrostatic muscle type, which has led to a more distributed motor control system despite a centralized brain, and have evolved a completely novel skin display system. Using these abilities, octopuses can form concepts, plan for the future, generate a cognitive map, and self-monitor for apparent pain and manipulate communication. Most cephalopods use the skin display system fairly automatically to deceive potential predators, although cuttlefish and squid also communicate with conspecifics. They do not appear to have the social sophistication to form a Theory of Mind when using it, but some squid can divorce the skin output from its motivational background sufficiently to produce two separately motivated displays in different directions at the same time. Thus, the cephalopods do appear to be moving towards consciousness, but on their own terms rather than our vertebrate terms.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Humphrey's hypothesis that consciousness might require warm-bloodedness leads to a testable prediction that markers of consciousness should cluster with endothermy, and it already looks very implausible given the many markers of consciousness seen in octopuses.
“A second example: Nicholas Humphrey, in Sentience (2022), hypothesized that consciousness might require warm-bloodedness (endothermy).Here too we have a hypothesized dependency between consciousness and a biological property, and again it leads to a long-run testable prediction: we should expect markers of consciousness to cluster with endothermy.Cold-blooded animals might achieve markers”
From AI Consciousness: A Centrist Manifesto (2025) · cites this paper as Mather (2025)
Cited by
Sorted by citations
AI Consciousness: A Centrist Manifesto
Birch, J. (2025) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/af7c9_v1 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- Mather, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Lethbridge (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Mather, Jennifer
- ORCID
- Mather, Jennifer
- Venue
- Animal Sentience
- Publisher
- WellBeing International Publications
- Published
- 2025-01-01
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 37
- ISSN
- 2377-7478 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4414991260
- Cited by
- 0
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Animal Sentience (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- WBI Studies Repository (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Cephalopods and Marine Biology
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Marine Invertebrate Physiology and Ecology
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Philosophy and Theoretical Science
- Keywords
- cephalopod cognition, cuttlefish, squid, chromatophores, cognitive maps, self-monitoring, pain perception, deception, communication, theory of mind
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review