CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Construction Project Management and PerformanceQuality and Supply ManagementBIM and Construction Integration

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Achieving Supply Chain Integration within Construction Industry

Open access
McDermotti, Peter, Khalfan, Malik·2012·Construction Economics and Building
DOI 10.5130/ajceb.v6i2.2983
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

The main driver behind the adoption of supply chain management (SCM) philosophy into the construction industry was the successes within other industry sectors. SCM can be defined as network of different organisations, linked upstream and downstream in a chain, aiming to produce quality and value in the services and products for the end consumers through integrated processes and activities. In order to achieve the optimised level of integration of the whole supply chain, the industry has responded in various forms. This paper will discuss different initiatives by the researchers,construction industry,and the UK government in order to achieve optimal level of supply chain integration. This paper will discuss the concept of aggregation,and also look at other supply chain integration related concepts including client-led supply chain, knowledge about the whole supply chain, effects of procurement on integration of supply chain, etc. The paper will give a brief overview and initial findings of a project undertaken by the authors, and also include examples from the UK construction industry on bundling of the supply and demand.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5130/ajceb.v6i2.2983

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Blockchain is an upcoming technology in the project management field, which has the potential to resolve implementation-related problems.

    “Blockchain is an upcoming technology in the project management field, which has the potential to resolve implementation-related problems [17-19].”

    From Blockchain Technology: Potential Applications for Public Sector E-Procurement and Project Management (2022) · cites this paper as [18]

    The Abstract and the section 'A Review of Supply Chain Management in Construction' discuss supply-chain integration and ways to address construction-industry problems, not blockchain. Searches for blockchain technology, project management, and distributed ledgers found no passage addressing the attributed claim. (LLM, conf=0.78)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Dainty, A. R. J.; Briscoe, G. H. and Millett, S. (2001a), Subcontractor perspective of supply chain alliances, Construction Management and Economics, Vol. 19, pp. 841-848.
  2. Khalfan, M. M. A., McDermott, P.; and Cooper, R. (2004), Integrating the supply chain within construction industry, Proceedings of 2dh ARCOM Conference, Heriot Watt University, 1 - 3 September, Vol. 2, pp. 897-904.
  3. Khalfan, M.M.A., and McDermott, P.(2005). Clients' role towards the integrated supply chain within construction industry, in Proceedings of W92 Conference in Las Vegas, 8-10 February 2005, Vol. 2, pp. 529 -537.
  4. Khalfan, M. M. A.; McDermott, P.; Tzortzopoulos, P. and Aouad,G. (2005), Achieving supply chain integration through knowing the supply chain participants,CIB W102 Conference on Information and Knowledge Management in a Global Economy, Lisbon, Portugal, 19 -20 May 2005, pp. 279 -288.
  5. Millett, S.J., Dainty, A.R.J., and Briscoe, G.H. (2001),Client procurement strategies:a cross- sectoral analysis, In:Proceedings 17th Annual ARCOM Conference. 5-7 September 2001, Salford.University of Salford. 907-915.
  6. O'Brien, W.; London, K. and Vrijhoef, R. (2002), Construction supply chain modelling: a research review and interdisciplinary research agenda, 1Oth Annual Conference of the International Group for Lean Construction, Gramado, Brazil, 6-8 August, pp. 129 -148.
  7. Vrijhoef, R. and Koskela, L. (2000), The four roles of supply chain management in construction,European Journal of Purchasing -----------------------TheAu _ str _
  8. a -lian""""'"""'""' "'.....,"'"''"'""'"'• No nfll- 54 1M Au. stralian Journal of Construction Economicsand Building [Vol6, No 2) and Supply Management, Vol. 6, 2000, pp. 169- 178.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
McDermotti, P., & Khalfan, M.
Affiliations
University of Salford (GB)
ORCID
Khalfan, Malik
Venue
Construction Economics and Building
Publisher
University of Technology, Sydney (UTS)
Published
2012-11-22
Volume
6
Issue
2
Pages
44-54
ISSN
2204-9029 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.5130/ajceb.v6i2.2983
OpenAlex
W1984892556
Cited by
35
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Construction Economics and Building (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal (University of Technology Sydney) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Construction Project Management and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management Information Systems › Quality and Supply Management
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › BIM and Construction Integration
Keywords
supply chain integration, supply chain management, construction industry, aggregation, supply chain knowledge, procurement, UK construction industry

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review