The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“At a median follow-up of 37.1 months, Sevinc et al. observed a 4% incidence of SSI and an 8% incidence of seroma, which compare well to the current study at 9.3% ± 0.03% and 6.6%, respectively.”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“Several studies have demonstrated similar ratios of 2–3 times greater onlay recurrence rates compared to retrorectus recurrence rates, comparable to the current study [[30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35]].”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“However, the subjects in the Sevinc et al. study had a BMI of 25.9 ± 3.5 kg/m2 and hernia defect of 73.4 ± 66.3 cm2, while patients in the current study had a BMI of 32.2 ± 4.5 kg/m2 and hernia defect of 115.7 ± 80.6 cm2.”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
In the citing paper
“At a median follow-up of 37.1 months, Sevinc et al. observed a 4% incidence of SSI and an 8% incidence of seroma, which compare well to the current study at 9.3% ± 0.03% and 6.6%, respectively.”
From Prospective, multicenter study of P4HB (Phasix™) mesh for hernia repair in cohort at risk for complications: 3-Year follow-up (2021) · cites this paper as [30]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Roth, J. S., Anthone, G. J., Selzer, D. J., Poulose, B. K., Pierce, R. A., Bittner, J. G., Hope, W. W., Dunn, R. M., Martindale, R. G., Goldblatt, M. I., et al. (2021) · Annals of Medicine and Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.amsu.2020.12.002 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Department of General Surgery, M. P. U. H., Sevinc, B., Okus, A., Department of General Surgery, K. U. S. O. M., Ay, S., Department of General Surgery, K. U. S. O. M., Aksoy, N., Department of General Surgery, K. T. A. R. H., Karahan, O., & Department of General Surgery, U. U. S. O. M.
- Venue
- Turkish Journal of Surgery
- Publisher
- Galenos Yayinevi
- Published
- 2018-05-15
- ISSN
- 2564-6850
- 2564-7032
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 0
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3712
- The paper
- Department of General Surgery, M. P. U. H., Sevinc, B., Okus, A., Department of General Surgery, K. U. S. O. M., Ay, S., Department of General Surgery, K. U. S. O. M., Aksoy, N., Department of General Surgery, K. T. A. R. H., Karahan, O., & Department of General Surgery, U. U. S. O. M. (2018). Randomized prospective comparison of long-term results of onlay and sublay mesh repair techniques for incisional hernia. Turkish Journal of Surgery. https://doi.org/10.5152/turkjsurg.2017.3712
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
