Cited by 60Laser-Plasma Interactions and DiagnosticsParticle accelerators and beam dynamicsPulsed Power Technology Applications

The DOI matches its DataCite record.

Particle-In-Cell Codes for Plasma-based Particle Acceleration

Open access
Pukhov, A.·2016·CERN, Geneva

Abstract

In this report we discuss the basic principles of Particle-In-Cell (PIC) codes and their application to plasma-based acceleration. The ab initio full electromagnetic relativistic PIC codes provide the most reliable description of plasmas, and their properties are described in detail. However, while they represent the most fundamental model, full PIC codes are computationally expensive. Plasma-based acceleration is a multi-scale problem with very disparate scales. The smallest scale is the laser or plasma wavelength (on the order of one to a hundred microns), and the largest scale is the acceleration distance (which ranges from a few centimetres to metres or even kilometres). The Lorentz boost technique allows the scale disparity to be reduced, at the cost of complicating the simulations and causing unphysical numerical instabilities in the code. Another possibility is to use the quasi-static approximation, whereby the different scales are separated analytically.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

DataCite · 10.5170/cern-2016-001.181

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 18

  1. [1][1] A Pukhov, Reports on progress in Physics 66, 47 (2001). -
  2. [5][5] R. W. Hockney & J. W. Eastwood, Computer Simulation Using Particles 540 S. (London: McGraw Hill 1981). -
  3. [7][7] L.Landau and E.~Lifshitz, The Classical Theory of Fields, 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., (1962). -
  4. [8][8] N. A. Krall and A. W. Trivelpiece, Principles of plasma physics , McGraw-Hill, N.Y. (1973). -
  5. [9][9] S. I. Braginskii, Transport properties in a plasma , in M. A. Leontovich (ed.) 'Review of plasma physics', Consult. Bureau, N.Y. (1965). -
  6. [14][14] A. Pukhov, Journal of Plasma Physics, accepted for publication (1999). -
  7. [15][15] K. V. Lotov, Phys. Rev. E 69, 046405 (2004) -
  8. [17][17] E. Esarey, C. B. Schroeder, and W. P. Leemans, Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 1229 (2009) -
  9. [18][18] F. F. Chen, Introduction to plasma physics and controlled fusion , N.Y.:Plenum Press (1984). -
  10. [19][19] Joshi, C., T. Tajima, J. M. Dawson, H. A. Baldis, and N. A. Ebrahim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47, 1285 (1981). -
  11. [20][20] Andreev, N. E., L. M. Gorbunov, V. I. Kirsanov, A. A. Pogosova, and R. R. Ramazashvili, Pis'ma Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 55, 551 (1992). -
  12. [21][21] Antonsen, T. M., Jr., and P. Mora, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2204 (1992). -
  13. [22][22] A Pukhov, N Kumar, T Tückmantel, A Upadhyay, K Lotov, P Muggli Physical review letters 107, 145003 (2011) -
  14. [25][25] B. B. Godfrey and J. L. Vay, arXiv:1502.01387v1 (2015) - · arXiv
  15. [26][26] P. Mora, T. M. Antonsen, Phys. Plasmas 4, 217 (1997) -
  16. [27][27] C. Huang, V.K. Decyk, C. Ren, M. Zhou, W. Lu, W.B. Mori, J.H. Cooley, T.M. Antonsen Jr., T. Katsouleas, Journal of Computational Physics 217, 658-679 (2006) -
  17. [29][29] D. R. Welch, D. V. Rose. B. V. Oliver, and R. E. Clark, Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 464, 134 (2001). -
  18. [30][30] T Tückmantel, A Pukhov, Journal of Computational Physics 269, 168-180 (2014)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Pukhov, A.
Affiliations
Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf (DE)
Corresponding author
Pukhov, A.
Venue
CERN, Geneva
Publisher
CERN, Geneva
Published
2016-02-16
Volume
1
Pages
181-181
ISSN
2331-8422 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2191484505
Cited by
60
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
Type
posted content
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
  • CERN eBooks (cc-by)
  • CERN Yellow Reports
Funders
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Laser-Plasma Interactions and Diagnostics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Nuclear and High Energy Physics › Particle accelerators and beam dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Pulsed Power Technology Applications
Keywords
particle-in-cell code, quasi-static approximation, numerical instability, laser-plasma acceleration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review