Cited by 12Geriatric Care and Nursing HomesDementia and Cognitive Impairment ResearchHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Evaluation of a transition care cognitive assessment and management pilot

Renehan, Emma, Haralambous, Betty, Galvin, Pauline, Kotis, Michelle, Dow, Briony·2013·Contemporary Nurse

Abstract

This paper describes the evaluation of the Transition Care Cognitive Assessment and Management Pilot (TC CAMP) at a residential care facility in Victoria, Australia. Transition care aims to provide a goal-oriented, time-limited service to older people at the conclusion of an episode of hospital care. The TC CAMP was established to specifically meet the needs of people with cognitive impairment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of the TC CAMP. The evaluation sought to explore the perceptions of staff and family carers, and outcomes for the person with dementia. Methods consisted of file audits, focus groups and individual interviews with nursing staff and carers. This evaluation found that it was possible to provide appropriate transition care to people with cognitive impairment who exhibited behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. The TC CAMP achieved length of stay and readmission rates that were comparable with transition care for cognitively intact people. The role of the Clinical Nurse Consultant was highly valued by staff and families involved in TC CAMP. The findings from TC CAMP suggest a suitable environment, availability of trained and resourced nursing and clinical staff and clear roles and expectations for all stakeholders should be considered in implementation of this model of care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5172/conu.2013.43.2.134

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Renehan, E., Haralambous, B., Galvin, P., Kotis, M., & Dow, B.
Affiliations
  • National Ageing Research Institute (AU)
  • Eastern Health (AU)
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
Venue
Contemporary Nurse
Published
2013-02
Volume
43
Issue
2
Pages
134-145
ISSN
  • 1037-6178 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-3535
OpenAlex
W2048850555
Cited by
12
References
15
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2015: 2
FWCI
1.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Contemporary Nurse (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
care transitions, cognitive impairment, dementia, behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia, residential care, clinical nurse consultants, implementation evaluation, length of hospital stay, hospital readmission, nurses' perceptions, family caregivers, older adults
MeSH terms
Cognition Disorders, Continuity of Patient Care, Humans, Pilot Projects, Victoria, Cohort Studies, Focus Groups

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review