Cited by 29Psychology and Mental HealthPsychological Treatments and AssessmentsHistorical Psychiatry and Medical Practices

The hegemony of cognitive-behaviour therapy in modern mental health care

Pilgrim, David·2011·Health Sociology Review

Abstract

Cognitive-behaviour therapy (CBT) has been a central plank in the mental health policies of many Anglophone countries in recent years. This emphasis reflects the triumph of modern rationalism in two senses. First, the appeal of CBT to policy makers rests largely on its claims of being evidenced-based and quickly effective. Second, it is committed to a view of eudemonia (the good life) in which rationality predominates over non-rationality to generate the greatest happiness for the greatest number. Both aspects, which appeal to policy makers, warrant sociological interrogation. This article provides a brief history of CBT to highlight the rhetoric of rationalism it has espoused successfully. Then, using the UK Depression Report as a point of departure, it compares this success of CBT with the criticisms it has encountered. Both positions of advocacy and critique are examined in relation to disciplinary knowledge and professional interest work. These orientations from poststructuralist accounts of the modern episteme, on the one hand, and neo-Weberian sociology of the professions, on the other, help us understand the current controversy surrounding CBT.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5172/hesr.2011.20.2.120

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CBT most directly targets cognition and the mastery system, partially impacts survival (coping) processes, and has only minimal impact on attachment or spirituality.

    “It can be argued that CBT most directly targets cognition and the mastery system, partially impacts survival (coping) processes, and has only minimal impact on attachment or spirituality (Bosmans, 2016; Pilgrim, 2011; Stewart-Sicking, 2015).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pilgrim, D.
Affiliations
University of Lancashire (GB)
Corresponding author
Pilgrim, David
Venue
Health Sociology Review
Published
2011-06
Volume
20
Issue
2
Pages
120-132
ISSN
  • 1446-1242 (ISSN-L)
  • 1839-3551
OpenAlex
W2085899221
Cited by
29
References
26
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
FWCI
1.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Sociology Review (publishedVersion)
  • CLOK (University of Central Lancashire) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Assessments
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Historical Psychiatry and Medical Practices
Keywords
cognitive behavioral therapy, mental health policy, rationalism, evidence-based practice, sociology of professions, disciplinary knowledge, mental health services

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review