The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.
How does student-directed assessment affect learning? Using assessment as a learning process
Abstract
This study originated in reaction to the 2008 introduction in Australia of a nation-wide assessment program in literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN) by the federal government. Assessment is widely regarded to play a key role in establishing and raising standards of learning but with the current political emphasis on using assessment for accountability and to monitor macro educational standards, its formative practice is less noted. Consequently, this mixed methods study was conducted at a primary school in the Northern Territory of Australia using student-directed assessment (SDA) as a learning process by drawing on formative assessment principles, constructivist learning approaches, and self-regulated learning. A simultaneous design was employed in which both qualitative and quantitative data were given equal priority. This study explored how students engage in learning when they are able to identify their own learning goals, determine their assessment criteria; and how they demonstrate their mastery of learning outcomes. This study indicated that when students in the participating year levels (years 2, 4, and 6) are involved in their own assessment and when assessment is central to learning, that deep and meaningful learning experiences occur. Through collaboration with teachers, students displayed behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement with their assessment tasks. In the case of the year-6 students, the SDA group who actively planned and took charge of their learning in the assessment process achieved significantly higher scores in their writing sample compared to their peers in the teacher directed assessment group.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“When used effectively, AfL can lead to increased student learning and achievement”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Fletcher & Shaw, 2012
In the citing paper
“Several studies pointed to the importance of involving students in AfL”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Fletcher & Shaw, 2012
In the citing paper
“Fletcher and Shaw (2012) suggested that teachers can involve students in the process of AfL by giving them specific responsibilities, for example, by letting students set their own learning goals and learning paths.”
From Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice (2020) · cites this paper as Fletcher and Shaw (2012)
Citations
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 94 · Cited by 22
Research works printed but not linked: 74
- Alexander, R., Armstrong, M., Flutter, J., Hargreaves, L., Harlen, W. , Harrison, D. & Utting, D. (2009).Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. London, England: Routledge.
- 10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.190 · DOI
- Baumgartner, T. A. & Strong, C. H. (1998).Conducting and reading research in health and human performance(2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
- Beishuizen, J. & Steffens, K. (2011). A conceptual framework for research on self-regulated learning. In R. Carneiro, P. Lefrere, K. Steffens, & J. Underwood (Eds.),Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: A European perspective(pp. 3–19). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
- Black, P. , Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003).Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
- Bogdan, R. & Taylor, S. J. (1975).Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. New York, NY: Wiley.
- 10.1080/0305498970230309 · DOI
- 10.1080/0969594022000027645 · DOI
- Bryman, A. (2012).Social research methods(4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
- Campbell, D. T. (1986). Relabeling internal and external validity for applied social scientists. In W. M. K. Trochim (ed.),Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis(pp. 67–78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- 10.1006/anbe.1995.0069 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365–2648.1998.00651.x · DOI
- Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- 10.1002/he.9903 · DOI
- Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. (2011).Designing and conducting mixed methods research(2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
- 10.1037/0022–0663.80.2.131 · DOI
- Daniels, H. (2001).Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
- 10.1080/13613320701503207 · DOI
- Darling-Hammond, L. (2010).The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
- Darling-Hammond, L. & Rothman, R. (2011). Lessons learned from Finland, Ontario, and Singapore. In L. Darling-Hammond & R. Rothman (Eds.),Teacher and leader effectiveness in high-performing education systems(pp. 1–13). Stanford, CA: The Alliance for Excellent Education.
- 10.1207/s15326934crj1201_7 · DOI
- Earl, L. M. (2003).Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
- 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01199.x · DOI
- 10.5172/mra.2011.5.2.200 · DOI
- Gipps, C. (1996). Assessment for learning. In A. Little & A. Wolf (Eds.),Assessment in transition: Learning, monitoring and selection in international perspective(pp. 251–262). New York, NY: Pergamon.
- 10.3102/01623737011003255 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/1359866X.2011.588312 · DOI
- Harlen, W. (2007).Assessment of learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. · DOI
- 10.1080/03004270802442334 · DOI
- Harrison, C. (2007). Making assessment work in the classroom. In J. Dillon & M. Maguire (Eds.),Becoming a teacher: Issues in secondary teaching(pp. 213–223). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
- 10.3102/0013189X017008010 · DOI
- Hughes, J. A. (1990).The philosophy of social research(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
- 10.1007/s11423-006-6493-3 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.003 · DOI
- 10.1080/0969594x.2011.592972 · DOI
- 10.5172/mra.2011.5.1.7 · DOI
- 10.1080/17508481003731026 · DOI
- Lingard, B. (2011). Changing teachers’ work in Australia. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Eds.),Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry; Essays in honour of Susan Groundwater-Smith(pp. 229–245). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- Lipman, P. (2009). Paradoxies of teaching in neo-liberal times: Educational ‘reform’ in Chicago. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.),Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward(pp. 67–80). Milton Park, England: Routledge.
- 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 · DOI · Paper page
- Meltzer, L. (2010).Promoting executive function in the classroom. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
- 10.2307/2112679 · DOI
- 10.1177/2345678906292462 · DOI
- 10.1080/09695940600703969 · DOI
- 10.1080/13645570500402447 · DOI
- 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_7 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.715 · DOI
- 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4 · DOI
- 10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.33 · DOI · Paper page
- Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In V. Richardson (ed.),Constructivist teacher education;Building a world of new understandings(pp. 3–14). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
- 10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x · DOI
- Rizvi, F. & Lingard, B. (2010).Globalizing education policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
- Ryan, A. & Pintrich, P. (1998). Achievement and social motivational influences on help-seeking in the classroom. In S. Karabenick (ed.),Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching(pp. 117–139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
- 10.1080/02680930601158919 · DOI
- Sahlberg, P. (2009). Educational change in Finland. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.),Second international handbook of educational change(vol. 23, pp. 323–348). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
- 10.1007/s10833-008-9098-2 · DOI
- 10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y · DOI
- 10.1002/0471264385.wei0704 · DOI
- 10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.151 · DOI
- Stobart, G. (2008).Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. New York; NY: Routledge. · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/s11409-008-9027-z · DOI
- 10.1177/2345678906292430 · DOI · Paper page
- Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Weeden, P. , Winter, J. & Broadfoot, P. (2002).Assessment: What’s in it for schools?New York, NY: Routledge. · DOI
- 10.1007/s11528-009-0287-5 · DOI
- 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292 · DOI
- 10.3102/0002831207312909 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/1163397 · DOI
- 10.3102/00028312029003663 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51 · DOI · Paper page
Metadata
- Authors
- Fletcher, A., & Shaw, G.
- Affiliations
- Charles Darwin University (AU)
- ORCID
- Fletcher, Anna
- Venue
- International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches
- Publisher
- Dialectical Publishing
- Published
- 2012-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 245-263
- ISSN
- 1834-0806 (ISSN-L)
- 1834-0814
- OpenAlex
- W2049205492
- Cited by
- 22
- References
- 94
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 4.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Shandong Academy of Sciences
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
- Keywords
- assessment as learning, formative assessment, student self-regulation, constructivist learning, NAPLAN, student engagement, student self-assessment, writing performance, elementary school students, teacher-student collaboration, educational accountability
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How does student-directed assessment affect learning? Using assessment as a learning process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.245
- The paper
- Fletcher, A., & Shaw, G. (2012). How does student-directed assessment affect learning? Using assessment as a learning process. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.245