Cited by 22Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsEducational and Psychological Assessments

The DOI matches its Crossref record; the references it cites are not checked yet.

How does student-directed assessment affect learning? Using assessment as a learning process

Fletcher, Anna, Shaw, Greg·2012·International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches

Abstract

This study originated in reaction to the 2008 introduction in Australia of a nation-wide assessment program in literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN) by the federal government. Assessment is widely regarded to play a key role in establishing and raising standards of learning but with the current political emphasis on using assessment for accountability and to monitor macro educational standards, its formative practice is less noted. Consequently, this mixed methods study was conducted at a primary school in the Northern Territory of Australia using student-directed assessment (SDA) as a learning process by drawing on formative assessment principles, constructivist learning approaches, and self-regulated learning. A simultaneous design was employed in which both qualitative and quantitative data were given equal priority. This study explored how students engage in learning when they are able to identify their own learning goals, determine their assessment criteria; and how they demonstrate their mastery of learning outcomes. This study indicated that when students in the participating year levels (years 2, 4, and 6) are involved in their own assessment and when assessment is central to learning, that deep and meaningful learning experiences occur. Through collaboration with teachers, students displayed behavioral, emotional, and cognitive engagement with their assessment tasks. In the case of the year-6 students, the SDA group who actively planned and took charge of their learning in the assessment process achieved significantly higher scores in their writing sample compared to their peers in the teacher directed assessment group.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.245

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 94 · Cited by 22

Research works printed but not linked: 74

  1. Alexander, R., Armstrong, M., Flutter, J., Hargreaves, L., Harlen, W. , Harrison, D. & Utting, D. (2009).Children, their world, their education: Final report and recommendations of the Cambridge Primary Review. London, England: Routledge.
  2. 10.1037/0022-3514.45.2.357 · DOI · Paper page
  3. 10.1037/0022-0663.81.2.190 · DOI
  4. Baumgartner, T. A. & Strong, C. H. (1998).Conducting and reading research in health and human performance(2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
  5. Beishuizen, J. & Steffens, K. (2011). A conceptual framework for research on self-regulated learning. In R. Carneiro, P. Lefrere, K. Steffens, & J. Underwood (Eds.),Self-regulated learning in technology enhanced learning environments: A European perspective(pp. 3–19). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Sense.
  6. Black, P. , Harrison, C., Lee, C., Marshall, B. & Wiliam, D. (2003).Assessment for learning: Putting it into practice. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
  7. Bogdan, R. & Taylor, S. J. (1975).Introduction to qualitative research methods: A phenomenological approach to the social sciences. New York, NY: Wiley.
  8. 10.1080/0305498970230309 · DOI
  9. 10.1080/0969594022000027645 · DOI
  10. Bryman, A. (2012).Social research methods(4th ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  11. Campbell, D. T. (1986). Relabeling internal and external validity for applied social scientists. In W. M. K. Trochim (ed.),Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis(pp. 67–78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  12. 10.1006/anbe.1995.0069 · DOI
  13. 10.1046/j.1365–2648.1998.00651.x · DOI
  14. Cohen, J. (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences(2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  15. 10.1002/he.9903 · DOI
  16. Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. (2011).Designing and conducting mixed methods research(2nd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
  17. 10.1037/0022–0663.80.2.131 · DOI
  18. Daniels, H. (2001).Vygotsky and pedagogy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  19. 10.1080/13613320701503207 · DOI
  20. Darling-Hammond, L. (2010).The flat world and education: How America’s commitment to equity will determine our future. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
  21. Darling-Hammond, L. & Rothman, R. (2011). Lessons learned from Finland, Ontario, and Singapore. In L. Darling-Hammond & R. Rothman (Eds.),Teacher and leader effectiveness in high-performing education systems(pp. 1–13). Stanford, CA: The Alliance for Excellent Education.
  22. 10.1207/s15326934crj1201_7 · DOI
  23. Earl, L. M. (2003).Assessment as learning: Using classroom assessment to maximize student learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
  24. 10.1111/j.2044-8279.1996.tb01199.x · DOI
  25. 10.5172/mra.2011.5.2.200 · DOI
  26. Gipps, C. (1996). Assessment for learning. In A. Little & A. Wolf (Eds.),Assessment in transition: Learning, monitoring and selection in international perspective(pp. 251–262). New York, NY: Pergamon.
  27. 10.3102/01623737011003255 · DOI · Paper page
  28. 10.1080/1359866X.2011.588312 · DOI
  29. Harlen, W. (2007).Assessment of learning. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. · DOI
  30. 10.1080/03004270802442334 · DOI
  31. Harrison, C. (2007). Making assessment work in the classroom. In J. Dillon & M. Maguire (Eds.),Becoming a teacher: Issues in secondary teaching(pp. 213–223). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
  32. 10.3102/0013189X017008010 · DOI
  33. Hughes, J. A. (1990).The philosophy of social research(2nd ed.). New York, NY: Longman.
  34. 10.1007/s11423-006-6493-3 · DOI
  35. 10.1016/j.stueduc.2011.03.003 · DOI
  36. 10.1080/0969594x.2011.592972 · DOI
  37. 10.5172/mra.2011.5.1.7 · DOI
  38. 10.1080/17508481003731026 · DOI
  39. Lingard, B. (2011). Changing teachers’ work in Australia. In N. Mockler & J. Sachs (Eds.),Rethinking educational practice through reflexive inquiry; Essays in honour of Susan Groundwater-Smith(pp. 229–245). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  40. Lipman, P. (2009). Paradoxies of teaching in neo-liberal times: Educational ‘reform’ in Chicago. In S. Gewirtz, P. Mahony, I. Hextall, & A. Cribb (Eds.),Changing teacher professionalism: International trends, challenges and ways forward(pp. 67–80). Milton Park, England: Routledge.
  41. 10.1093/fampra/13.6.522 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Meltzer, L. (2010).Promoting executive function in the classroom. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
  43. 10.2307/2112679 · DOI
  44. 10.1177/2345678906292462 · DOI
  45. 10.1080/09695940600703969 · DOI
  46. 10.1080/13645570500402447 · DOI
  47. 10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1 · DOI · Paper page
  48. 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_7 · DOI · Paper page
  49. 10.1037/0022-0663.90.4.715 · DOI
  50. 10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4 · DOI
  51. 10.1037//0022-0663.82.1.33 · DOI · Paper page
  52. Richardson, V. (1997). Constructivist teaching and teacher education: Theory and practice. In V. Richardson (ed.),Constructivist teacher education;Building a world of new understandings(pp. 3–14). London: RoutledgeFalmer.
  53. 10.1046/j.1467-9620.2003.00303.x · DOI
  54. Rizvi, F. & Lingard, B. (2010).Globalizing education policy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  55. Ryan, A. & Pintrich, P. (1998). Achievement and social motivational influences on help-seeking in the classroom. In S. Karabenick (ed.),Strategic help seeking: Implications for learning and teaching(pp. 117–139). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  56. 10.1080/02680930601158919 · DOI
  57. Sahlberg, P. (2009). Educational change in Finland. In A. Hargreaves, A. Lieberman, M. Fullan, & D. Hopkins (Eds.),Second international handbook of educational change(vol. 23, pp. 323–348). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
  58. 10.1007/s10833-008-9098-2 · DOI
  59. 10.1007/s10833-011-9157-y · DOI
  60. 10.1002/0471264385.wei0704 · DOI
  61. 10.1037/0003-066x.55.1.151 · DOI
  62. Stobart, G. (2008).Testing times: The uses and abuses of assessment. New York; NY: Routledge. · DOI · Paper page
  63. 10.1007/s11409-008-9027-z · DOI
  64. 10.1177/2345678906292430 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978).Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  66. Weeden, P. , Winter, J. & Broadfoot, P. (2002).Assessment: What’s in it for schools?New York, NY: Routledge. · DOI
  67. 10.1007/s11528-009-0287-5 · DOI
  68. 10.1207/s15326985ep2501_2 · DOI · Paper page
  69. 10.1080/00461520.1998.9653292 · DOI
  70. 10.3102/0002831207312909 · DOI · Paper page
  71. 10.2307/1163397 · DOI
  72. 10.3102/00028312029003663 · DOI · Paper page
  73. 10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284 · DOI · Paper page
  74. 10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.51 · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Fletcher, A., & Shaw, G.
Affiliations
Charles Darwin University (AU)
Venue
International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches
Published
2012-12
Volume
6
Issue
3
Pages
245-263
ISSN
  • 1834-0806 (ISSN-L)
  • 1834-0814
OpenAlex
W2049205492
Cited by
22
References
94
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1
FWCI
4.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches (publishedVersion)
Funders
Shandong Academy of Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational and Psychological Assessments
Keywords
assessment as learning, formative assessment, student self-regulation, constructivist learning, NAPLAN, student engagement, student self-assessment, writing performance, elementary school students, teacher-student collaboration, educational accountability

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How does student-directed assessment affect learning? Using assessment as a learning process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.245
The paper
Fletcher, A., & Shaw, G. (2012). How does student-directed assessment affect learning? Using assessment as a learning process. International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches. https://doi.org/10.5172/mra.2012.6.3.245