Continuance intention of mobile payment Using modified extending model of acceptance and use of technology
Open accessAbstract
Mobile payment (m-payment) is payment using information technology system. Nowadays, the system is growing familiar to pay online shopping in Indonesia. There are almost a half of Indonesian population using m-payment for business transactions. One of m-payments which is growing popular called DANA. Introducing information technology into a business is important to make transaction easier than traditional one. This phenomenon has been studied based on the extension of Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT2). The research’s aim is to analyse the effect of UTAUT2’s variables on sustainability m-payment usability and the role of user’s experience as a moderator. All DANA users as the population of this study and the sample are 100 DANA users in Malang, East Java. Simple linear regression and Moderated Regression Analysis (MRA) completed to examine relevance hypothesis. The results shows that the statement of price saving orientation and information quality are not reliable, there is a significant positive effect both of hedonic motivation and habits on continuance intention, and experience does not moderate the effect of hedonic motivation on continuance intention.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Research on mobile payment adoption supports the positive influence of habit and social norms on technology adoption.
“Research on mobile payment adoption further supports the positive influence of habit and social norms on technology adoption [35,36].”
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483 · see citing works
Predicting dishonest actions using the theory of planned behavior
Beck, L., & Ajzen, I. (1991) · Journal of Research in Personality · doi:10.1016/0092-6566(91)90021-h · Cited by 1,325 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Dahmani, M., & Ben Youssef, A. (2023) · Platforms · doi:10.3390/platforms1010005 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
- Authors
- Handayanto, E., & Ambarwati, R.
- Affiliations
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang (ID)
- Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo (ID)
- Corresponding author
- Handayanto, Eko
- ORCID
- Handayanto, Eko
- Venue
- AMCA Journal of Science and Technology
- Published
- 2022-02-26
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-9
- ISSN
- 2774-8324 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4214681637
- Cited by
- 8
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
- FWCI
- 1.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- diamond
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- AMCA Journal of Science & Technology (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Technology Adoption and User Behaviour
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Health, Technology, Consumer Behavior
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- mobile payment, continuance intention, UTAUT2, DANA, user experience, hedonic motivation, habit, information quality, online shopping, Indonesian users
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review