The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Exploring Faculty Perceptions of Professional Development Support for Transitioning to Emergency Remote Teaching
Abstract
Professional development (PD) for instructors at higher education institutions offering online courses is important for assuring the quality of online programs. However, PD opportunities for faculty members have often been piecemeal and inadequate. In light of the COVID-19 pandemic that forced instructors around the world to teach online, PD has become even more critical to the success of the instructors, students, and institutions themselves. This paper describes research conducted at a large university in the United States that used a survey developed to operationalize Baran and Correia’s (2014) holistic Professional Development Framework for Online Teaching (PDFOT). The survey identified strengths and weaknesses in PD support that could be targeted for growth and improvement. Key findings include a need to bolster support at each of the teaching, community, and organizational levels. Recommendations for addressing improvements are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical importance of equipping teachers with digital teaching skills to ensure school resilience in the face of unforeseen crises (Flores, 2020;Redstone & Luo, 2021;Rodés et al., 2021;Schildkamp et al., 2020;Trikoilis & Papanastasiou, 2020).”
From Transforming Online Teacher Training Through Expansive Learning: A Case Study Applying Cultural-Historical Activity Theory and the Change Laboratory Method (2025) · cites this paper as Redstone & Luo, 2021
Citations
Cites
The publisher hasn’t deposited this paper’s reference list.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Chen, K.-Z., Tseng, J.-Y., & Oakley, B. (2025) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-024-00954-y · Cited by 5
“The COVID-19 pandemic has underscored the critical importance of equipping teachers with digital teaching skills to ensure school resilience in the face of unforeseen crises (Flores, 2020; Redstone & Luo, 2021; Rodés et al., 2021; Schildkamp et al., 2020; Trikoilis & Papanastasiou, 2020).”
Adapting Under Pressure: A Case Study in Scaling Faculty Development for Emergency Remote Teaching
Gomez, D. R., Swann, W., Wohlwend, M. W., & Spong, S. (2022) · Journal of Computing in Higher Education · doi:10.1007/s12528-022-09330-5 · Cited by 4
Krull, G., & MacAlister, F. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-323-91185-6.00029-x · Cited by 4
Does professional development for online instruction improve student course outcomes?
Zhou, X., Li, Q., & Xu, D. (2025) · The Internet and Higher Education · doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2025.100993 · Cited by 5
Venter, A., van Rensburg, E., & Govender, P. (2026) · Progressio South African Journal for Open and Distance Learning Practice · doi:10.25159/2663-5895/17177
Metadata
- Authors
- Redstone, A., & Luo, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Instructional Design
- Published
- 2021-05
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 2
- ISSN
- 2160-5289 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3161870813
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2
- FWCI
- 1.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Instructional Design (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Education during COVID-19 pandemic
- Social Sciences › Education › Evaluation of Teaching Practices
- Social Sciences › Education › Online and Blended Learning
- Keywords
- faculty professional development, emergency remote teaching, online learning, COVID-19 pandemic, higher education teachers, online course quality, teacher perceptions, teaching support, organizational support
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review