The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation mechanism in the North China Plain
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. A regional haze episode occurred in the Beijing, Tianjin and Hebei province (BTH) area in the North China Plain (NCP) from 16 to 19 January 2010. Data were collected and analyzed during the time frame of 14 through 23 January 2010 to include the haze event. The increase of secondary inorganic pollutants (SO42−, NO3−, NH4+) in PM2.5 was observed simultaneously at four sites, especially in the plain area of the BTH, which could be identified as a common characteristic of pollution haze in east China. The sulfate and nitrate in PM2.5 were mainly formed through the heterogeneous reaction process in the urban area. The organic matter (OM) increased more significantly at the Chengde (CD) site than the other three sites in the plain area. The secondary organic aerosols only existed during haze days at CD but in both haze and non-haze days at the other three sites, which suggested the greater regional impact of secondary formation process during the haze episode. The secondary formation of aerosol was one important formation mechanism of haze. The strong temperature inversion and descending air motions in the planetary boundary layer (PBL) allowed pollutants to accumulate in a shallow layer. The weak surface wind speed produced high pollutants concentration within source regions. The accumulation of pollutants was one main factor in the haze formation. The enhanced southwest wind in the last period of this episode transported pollutants to the downwind area and expanded the regional scope of the haze.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Light Absorption by Carbonaceous Particles: An Investigative Review
Bond, T. C., & Bergstrom, R. W. (2006) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786820500421521 · Cited by 2,980
Cited by
Mineral dust and NOx promote the conversion of SO2 to sulfate in heavy pollution days
He, H., Wang, Y., Ma, Q., Ma, J., Chu, B., Ji, D., Tang, G., Liu, C., Zhang, H., & Hao, J. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep04172 · Cited by 531
Tao, J., Zhang, L., Cao, J., & Zhang, R. (2017) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-17-9485-2017 · Cited by 377
Wang, Y., Zhang, Q., Jiang, J., Zhou, W., Wang, B., He, K., Duan, F., Zhang, Q., Philip, S., & Xie, Y. (2014) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2013jd021426 · Cited by 366
Real-time chemical characterization of atmospheric particulate matter in China: A review
Li, Y. J., Sun, Y., Zhang, Q., Li, X., Li, M., Zhou, Z., & Chan, C. K. (2017) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.027 · Cited by 264
Zhan, Y., Luo, Y., Deng, X., Chen, H., Grieneisen, M. L., Shen, X., Zhu, L., & Zhang, M. (2017) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2017.02.023 · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng, Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., & Shi, Q. F.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2013-06-13
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 11
- Pages
- 5685-5696
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2023307338
- Cited by
- 611
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation mechanism in the North China Plain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013
- The paper
- Zhao, X. J., Zhao, P. S., Xu, J., Meng, Pu, W. W., Dong, F., He, D., & Shi, Q. F. (2013). Analysis of a winter regional haze event and its formation mechanism in the North China Plain. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-13-5685-2013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.