The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. The planetary boundary layer (PBL) height is a key parameter in air quality control and pollutant dispersion. The PBL height cannot, however, be directly measured, and its estimation relies on the analysis of the vertical profiles of the temperature, turbulence or the atmospheric composition. An operational PBL height detection method including several remote sensing instruments (wind profiler, Raman lidar, microwave radiometer) and several algorithms (Parcel and bulk Richardson number methods, surface-based temperature inversion, aerosol or humidity gradient analysis) was developed and tested with 1 year of measurements, which allows the methods to be validated against radio sounding measurements. The microwave radiometer provides convective boundary layer heights in good agreement with the radio sounding (RS) (median bias < 25 m, R2 > 0.70) and allows the analysis of the diurnal variation of the PBL height due to its high temporal resolution. The Raman lidar also leads to a good agreement with RS, whereas the wind profiler yields some more dispersed results mostly due to false attribution problems. A comparison with the numerical weather prediction model COSMO-2 has shown a general overestimation of the model PBL height by some hundreds to thousand meters. Finally the seasonal cycles of the daytime and nighttime PBL heights are discussed for each instrument and each detection algorithm for two stations on the Swiss plateau.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Stull, R. B. (1988) · An Introduction to Boundary Layer Meteorology · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3027-8_12 · Cited by 117
Salmond, J. A., & McKendry, I. G. (2005) · Progress in Physical Geography: Earth and Environment · doi:10.1191/0309133305pp442ra · Cited by 117
Cited by
Hummel, M., Hoose, C., Gallagher, M., Healy, D. A., Huffman, J. A., O'Connor, D., Pöschl, U., Pöhlker, C., Robinson, N. H., Schnaiter, M., et al. (2015) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-15-6127-2015 · Cited by 59
“It was shown for COSMO-2 simulations over the Swiss Plateau that this method overestimates hPBL for convective boundary layers and strongly underestimates it for stable boundary layers (Collaud Coen et al., 2014).”
MethodJozef, G., Cassano, J., Dahlke, S., & de Boer, G. (2022) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-15-4001-2022 · Cited by 34
Miller, A. J., Ramelli, F., Fuchs, C., Omanovic, N., Spirig, R., Zhang, H., Lohmann, U., Kanji, Z. A., & Henneberger, J. (2024) · Atmospheric Measurement Techniques · doi:10.5194/amt-17-601-2024 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Collaud Coen, M., Praz, C., Haefele, A., Ruffieux, D., Kaufmann, P., & Calpini, B.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2014-12-11
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 23
- Pages
- 13205-13221
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2039734830
- Cited by
- 174
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 5.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-14-13205-2014
- The paper
- Collaud Coen, M., Praz, C., Haefele, A., Ruffieux, D., Kaufmann, P., & Calpini, B. (2014). Determination and climatology of the planetary boundary layer height above the Swiss plateau by in situ and remote sensing measurements as well as by the COSMO-2 model. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-13205-2014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.