Cited by 26Atmospheric aerosols and cloudsAerospace and Aviation TechnologyAtmospheric chemistry and aerosols

Two new multirotor uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) for glaciogenic cloud seeding and aerosol measurements within the CLOUDLAB project

Open access
Miller, Anna J., Ramelli, Fabiola, Fuchs, Christopher, Omanovic, Nadja, Spirig, Robert, Zhang, Huiying, Lohmann, Ulrike, Kanji, Zamin A. +1 more·2024·Atmospheric Measurement Techniques

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) have become widely used in a range of atmospheric science research applications. Because of their small size, flexible range of motion, adaptability, and low cost, multirotor UAVs are especially well-suited for probing the lower atmosphere. However, their use so far has been limited to conditions outside of clouds, first because of the difficulty of flying beyond visual line of sight and second because of the challenge of flying in icing conditions in supercooled clouds. Here, we present two UAVs for cloud microphysical research: one UAV (the measurement UAV) equipped with a Portable Optical Particle Spectrometer (POPS) and meteorological sensors to probe the aerosol and meteorological properties in the boundary layer and one UAV (the seeding UAV) equipped with seeding flares to produce a plume of particles that can nucleate ice in supercooled clouds. A propeller heating mechanism on both UAVs allows for operating in supercooled clouds with icing conditions. These UAVs are an integral part of the CLOUDLAB project in which glaciogenic cloud seeding of supercooled low stratus clouds is utilized for studying aerosol–cloud interactions and ice crystal formation and growth. In this paper, we first show validations of the POPS on board the measurement UAV, demonstrating that the rotor turbulence has a small effect on measured particle number concentrations. We then exemplify the applicability for profiling the planetary boundary layer, as well as for sampling and characterizing aerosol plumes, in this case, the seeding plume. We also present a new method for filtering out high-concentration data to ensure good data quality of POPS. We explain the different flight patterns that are possible for both UAVs, namely horizontal or vertical leg patterns or hovering, with an extensive and flexible parameter space for designing the flight patterns according to our scientific goals. Finally, we show two examples of seeding experiments: first characterizing an out-of-cloud seeding plume with the measurement UAV flying horizontal transects through the plume and, second, characterizing an in-cloud seeding plume with downstream measurements from a POPS and a holographic imager mounted on a tethered balloon. Particle number concentrations and particle number size distributions of the seeding plume from the experiments reveal that we can successfully produce and measure the seeding plume, both in-cloud (with accompanying elevated ice crystal number concentrations) and out-of-cloud. The methods presented here will be useful for probing the lower atmosphere, for characterizing aerosol plumes, and for deepening our cloud microphysical understanding through cloud seeding experiments, all of which have the potential to benefit the atmospheric science community.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.5194/amt-17-601-2024

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • CLOUDLAB investigates ice microphysical processes in supercooled low-stratus clouds over the Swiss Plateau through controlled glaciogenic seeding using uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) during three winter campaigns.

    “It investigates ice microphysical processes in supercooled low-stratus clouds over the Swiss Plateau through controlled glaciogenic seeding using uncrewed aerial vehicles (UAVs) during three winter campaigns (Henneberger et al., 2023; Miller et al., 2024)”

    From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2024

    The Introduction and Discussion and conclusions describe CLOUDLAB’s controlled UAV seeding of supercooled stratus clouds to investigate ice formation and growth. Section 2.5 places the field site on the Swiss Plateau, but says two winter campaigns had been conducted and a third was planned; it does not establish that the investigation had taken place during three campaigns. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The CLOUDLAB UAV delivery system was validated in clear-sky (or out-of-cloud) experiments that aimed to characterize the dispersion and concentration of seeding particles without interference from cloud microphysical processes, providing a baseline for comparison with in-cloud seeding missions.

    “The UAV delivery system was validated in clear-sky (or out-of-cloud) experiments that aimed to characterize the dispersion and concentration of seeding particles without interference from cloud microphysical processes, providing a baseline for comparison with in-cloud seeding missions (Miller et al., 2024)”

    From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2024

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cross-validation protocols compared POPS aerosol data with TBS measurement, ensuring consistency in plume characterization.

    “Crossvalidation protocols compared POPS aerosol data with TBS measurement, ensuring consistency in plume characterization (Miller et al., 2024)”

    From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2024

    Section 3.1 and Appendix B compare aerosol measurements from POPS instruments mounted on the UAV and TBS, finding generally good agreement in laboratory tests. They do not establish that cross-validation ensured consistent plume characterization; Section 5.2 instead reports fluctuations in some in-cloud TBS measurements. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The second CLOUDLAB campaign (2022-2023) refined technical execution, optimizing UAV performance (e.g., icing resistance, flare ignition protocols) and validating aerosol measurements from the POPS to characterize seeding particle emissions.

    “The second campaign (2022-2023) refined technical execution, optimizing UAV performance (e.g., icing resistance, flare ignition protocols) and validating aerosol measurements from the POPS to characterize seeding particle emissions (Miller et al., 2024)”

    From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2024

    Split into 2 atoms — 0 confirmed, 2 partially supported, 0 disputed, 0 misattributed, 0 unverifiable. Expand the claim to see per-atom verdicts.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Radar reflectivity and HOLIMO-derived growth timescales were aligned with UAV trajectory data to isolate seeding-induced microphysical responses.

    “Radar reflectivity and HOLIMO-derived growth timescales were aligned with UAV trajectory data to isolate seeding-induced microphysical responses (Miller et al., 2024)”

    From Past Field Experiments of Solar Radiation Modification: A Review of the Scientific and Technical Aspects for Governance (2026) · cites this paper as Miller et al., 2024

    Section 5.2 links four peaks in POPS and HOLIMO measurements to the seeding UAV’s four flight legs and compares plume-arrival timing with a calculated advection time to distinguish the plume from natural cloud variation. The paper does not describe aligning radar reflectivity or HOLIMO-derived growth timescales with UAV trajectory data; the timescale reported here is for advection, not growth. Page numbers were not available in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.86)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 71 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Griffith, D. A., Solak, M. E., and Yorty, D. P.: 30+ Winter Seasons Of Operational Cloud Seeding In Utah, Journal of Weather Mod- ification, 41, 23-37, https://journalofweathermodification.org/ index.php/JWM/article/view/175 (last access: 31 January 2022), 2009.
  2. Miller, A. J., Ramelli, F., Fuchs, C., Omanovic, N., Spirig, R., Huiy- ing, Z., Lohmann, U., Kanji, Z. A., and Henneberger, J.: Data for publication: "Two new multirotor Uncrewed Aerial Vehi- cles (UAVs) for glaciogenic cloud seeding and aerosol measure- ments within the CLOUDLAB project", ETH Zurich [data set], https://doi.org/20.500.11850/640942, 2023.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Miller, A. J., Ramelli, F., Fuchs, C., Omanovic, N., Spirig, R., Zhang, H., Lohmann, U., Kanji, Z. A., & Henneberger, J.
Affiliations
ETH Zurich (CH)
Corresponding author
Henneberger, Jan
Venue
Atmospheric Measurement Techniques
Published
2024-01-26
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
601-625
ISSN
  • 1867-1381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1867-8548
OpenAlex
W4391271762
Cited by
26
References
71
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 1
FWCI
4.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Atmospheric measurement techniques (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • ETH Zürich Research Collection (cc-by)
Funders
HORIZON EUROPE European Research Council (101021272 CLOUDLAB)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Atmospheric aerosols and clouds
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Aerospace and Aviation Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
Keywords
multirotor drones, supercooled clouds, aerosol-cloud interactions, ice nucleation, aerosol plumes, ice crystal number concentration, particle number size distribution, CLOUDLAB, flight patterns, data quality filtering

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review