The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. A convective parameterization is described and evaluated that may be used in high resolution non-hydrostatic mesoscale models as well as in modeling system with unstructured varying grid resolutions and for convection aware simulations. This scheme is based on a stochastic approach originally implemented by Grell and Devenyi (2002). Two approaches are tested on resolutions ranging from 20 km to 5 km. One approach is based on spreading subsidence to neighboring grid points, the other one on a recently introduced method by Arakawa et al. (2011). Results from model intercomparisons, as well as verification with observations indicate that both the spreading of the subsidence and Arakawa's approach work well for the highest resolution runs. Because of its simplicity and its capability for an automatic smooth transition as the resolution is increased, Arakawa's approach may be preferred. Additionally, interactions with aerosols have been implemented through a cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) dependent autoconversion of cloud water to rain as well as an aerosol dependent evaporation of cloud drops. Initial tests with this newly implemented aerosol approach show plausible results with a decrease in predicted precipitation in some areas, caused by the changed autoconversion mechanism. This change also causes a significant increase of cloud water and ice detrainment near the cloud tops. Some areas also experience an increase of precipitation, most likely caused by strengthened downdrafts.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A Description of the Advanced Research WRF Version 2
Skamarock, W., Klemp, J., Dudhia, J., Gill, D., Barker, D., & Wang, W. (2005) · NSF National Center for Atmospheric Research · doi:10.5065/d6dz069t · Cited by 2,504
Emanuel, K. A. (1994) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780195066302.001.0001 · Cited by 1,205
Cited by
Satellite Discovery of Anomalously Large Methane Point Sources From Oil/Gas Production
Varon, D. J., McKeever, J., Jervis, D., Maasakkers, J. D., Pandey, S., Houweling, S., Aben, I., Scarpelli, T., & Jacob, D. J. (2019) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2019gl083798 · Cited by 331
Yuval, J., & O’Gorman, P. A. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-17142-3 · Cited by 283
Satellite observations reveal extreme methane leakage from a natural gas well blowout
Pandey, S., Gautam, R., Houweling, S., van der Gon, H. D., Sadavarte, P., Borsdorff, T., Hasekamp, O., Landgraf, J., Tol, P., van Kempen, T., et al. (2019) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1908712116 · Cited by 267
Ma, M., Gao, Y., Wang, Y., Zhang, S., Leung, L. R., Liu, C., Wang, S., Zhao, B., Chang, X., Su, H., et al. (2019) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-19-12195-2019 · Cited by 216
Li, H., Huang, Y., Hu, S., Wu, N., Liu, X., & Xiao, H. (2021) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2021jd035556 · Cited by 23
Metadata
- Authors
- Grell, G. A., & Freitas, S. R.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2014-05-27
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5233-5250
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2073767379
- Cited by
- 1,217
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 31.55
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-14-5233-2014
- The paper
- Grell, G. A., & Freitas, S. R. (2014). A scale and aerosol aware stochastic convective parameterization for weather and air quality modeling. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-14-5233-2014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.