The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Identification and quantification of gaseous organic compounds emitted from biomass burning using two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. The current understanding of secondary organic aerosol (SOA) formation within biomass burning (BB) plumes is limited by the incomplete identification and quantification of the non-methane organic compounds (NMOCs) emitted from such fires. Gaseous organic compounds were collected on sorbent cartridges during laboratory burns as part of the fourth Fire Lab at Missoula Experiment (FLAME-4) and analyzed by two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry (GC × GC–ToFMS). The sensitivity and resolving power of GC × GC–ToFMS allowed the acquisition of the most extensive data set of BB NMOCs to date, with measurements for 708 positively or tentatively identified compounds. Estimated emission factors (EFs) are presented for these compounds for burns of six different vegetative fuels, including conifer branches, grasses, agricultural residue, and peat. The number of compounds meeting the peak selection criteria ranged from 129 to 474 among individual burns, and included extensive isomer groups. For example, 38 monoterpene isomers were observed in the emissions from coniferous fuels; the isomeric ratios were found to be consistent with those reported in relevant essential oils, suggesting that the composition of such oils may be very useful when predicting fuel-dependent terpene emissions. Further, 11 sesquiterpenes were detected and tentatively identified, providing the first reported speciation of sesquiterpenes in gas-phase BB emissions. The calculated EFs for all measured compounds are compared and discussed in the context of potential SOA formation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Emission factors for open and domestic biomass burning for use in atmospheric models
Akagi, S. K., Yokelson, R. J., Wiedinmyer, C., Alvarado, M. J., Reid, J. S., Karl, T., Crounse, J. D., & Wennberg, P. O. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-4039-2011 · Cited by 2,047
Self-citationThe amount of carbon released from peat and forest fires in Indonesia during 1997
Page, S. E., Siegert, F., Rieley, J. O., Boehm, H.-D. V., Jaya, A., & Limin, S. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature01131 · Cited by 1,885
Biomass burning in Asia: annual and seasonal estimates and atmospheric emissions
Streets, D. G., Yarber, K. F., Woo, J. ‐., & Carmichael, G. R. (2003) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2003gb002040 · Cited by 807
Influence of inorganic salts on the primary pyrolysis products of cellulose
Patwardhan, P. R., Satrio, J. A., Brown, R. C., & Shanks, B. H. (2010) · Bioresource Technology · doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2010.01.112 · Cited by 799
Effect of the Temperature on the Composition of Lignin Pyrolysis Products
Jiang, G., Nowakowski, D. J., & Bridgwater, A. V. (2010) · Energy & Fuels · doi:10.1021/ef100363c · Cited by 332
Cited by
Crop Residue Burning in India: Policy Challenges and Potential Solutions
Bhuvaneshwari, S., Hettiarachchi, H., & Meegoda, J. N. (2019) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph16050832 · Cited by 817
Review on recent progress in observations, source identifications and countermeasures of PM2.5
Liang, C.-S., Duan, F.-K., He, K.-B., & Ma, Y.-L. (2016) · Environment International · doi:10.1016/j.envint.2015.10.016 · Cited by 375
Hodshire, A. L., Akherati, A., Alvarado, M. J., Brown-Steiner, B., Jathar, S. H., Jimenez, J. L., Kreidenweis, S. M., Lonsdale, C. R., Onasch, T. B., Ortega, A. M., et al. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b02588 · Cited by 286
He, Y., King, B., Pothier, M., Lewane, L., Akherati, A., Mattila, J., Farmer, D. K., McCormick, R. L., Thornton, M., Pierce, J. R., et al. (2020) · Environmental Science: Processes & Impacts · doi:10.1039/d0em00103a · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Hatch, L. E., Luo, W., Pankow, J. F., Yokelson, R. J., Stockwell, C. E., & Barsanti, K. C.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2015-02-23
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 1865-1899
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2100744663
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 8.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Identification and quantification of gaseous organic compounds emitted from biomass burning using two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-15-1865-2015
- The paper
- Hatch, L. E., Luo, W., Pankow, J. F., Yokelson, R. J., Stockwell, C. E., & Barsanti, K. C. (2015). Identification and quantification of gaseous organic compounds emitted from biomass burning using two-dimensional gas chromatography–time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-1865-2015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.