The DOI matches its Crossref record; 148 of the 148 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. Land-surface models (LSMs) are increasingly called upon to represent not only the exchanges of energy, water and momentum across the land–atmosphere interface (their original purpose in climate models), but also how ecosystems and water resources respond to climate, atmospheric environment, land-use and land-use change, and how these responses in turn influence land–atmosphere fluxes of carbon dioxide (CO2), trace gases and other species that affect the composition and chemistry of the atmosphere. However, the LSMs embedded in state-of-the-art climate models differ in how they represent fundamental aspects of the hydrological and carbon cycles, resulting in large inter-model differences and sometimes faulty predictions. These "third-generation" LSMs respect the close coupling of the carbon and water cycles through plants, but otherwise tend to be under-constrained, and have not taken full advantage of robust hydrological parameterizations that were independently developed in offline models. Benchmarking, combining multiple sources of atmospheric, biospheric and hydrological data, should be a required component of LSM development, but this field has been relatively poorly supported and intermittently pursued. Moreover, benchmarking alone is not sufficient to ensure that models improve. Increasing complexity may increase realism but decrease reliability and robustness, by increasing the number of poorly known model parameters. In contrast, simplifying the representation of complex processes by stochastic parameterization (the representation of unresolved processes by statistical distributions of values) has been shown to improve model reliability and realism in both atmospheric and land-surface modelling contexts. We provide examples for important processes in hydrology (the generation of runoff and flow routing in heterogeneous catchments) and biology (carbon uptake by species-diverse ecosystems). We propose that the way forward for next-generation complex LSMs will include: (a) representations of biological and hydrological processes based on the implementation of multiple internal constraints; (b) systematic application of benchmarking and data assimilation techniques to optimize parameter values and thereby test the structural adequacy of models; and (c) stochastic parameterization of unresolved variability, applied in both the hydrological and the biological domains.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The worldwide leaf economics spectrum
Wright, I. J., Reich, P. B., Westoby, M., Ackerly, D. D., Baruch, Z., Bongers, F., Cavender-Bares, J., Chapin, T., Cornelissen, J. H. C., Diemer, M., et al. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02403 · Cited by 9,021
Rebuilding community ecology from functional traits
MCGILL, B., ENQUIST, B., WEIHER, E., & WESTOBY, M. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.02.002 · Cited by 4,631
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., & Burges, S. J. (1994) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/94jd00483 · Cited by 4,051
Self-citationAinsworth, E. A., & Long, S. P. (2005) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2004.01224.x · Cited by 3,624
Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models
Duan, Q., Sorooshian, S., & Gupta, V. (1992) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/91wr02985 · Cited by 3,310
Climate–Carbon Cycle Feedback Analysis: Results from the C4MIP Model Intercomparison
Friedlingstein, P., Cox, P., Betts, R., Bopp, L., von Bloh, W., Brovkin, V., Cadule, P., Doney, S., Eby, M., Fung, I., et al. (2006) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli3800.1 · Cited by 2,902
Regions of Strong Coupling Between Soil Moisture and Precipitation
Koster, R. D., Dirmeyer, P. A., Guo, Z., Bonan, G., Chan, E., Cox, P., Gordon, C. T., Kanae, S., Kowalczyk, E., Lawrence, D., et al. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1100217 · Cited by 2,872
TRY – a global database of plant traits
KATTGE, J., DÍAZ, S., LAVOREL, S., PRENTICE, I. C., LEADLEY, P., BÖNISCH, G., GARNIER, E., WESTOBY, M., REICH, P. B., WRIGHT, I. J., et al. (2011) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2011.02451.x · Cited by 2,638
Self-citationCollatz, G. J., Ball, J. T., Grivet, C., & Berry, J. A. (1991) · Agricultural and Forest Meteorology · doi:10.1016/0168-1923(91)90002-8 · Cited by 2,270
A Simple Parameterization of Land Surface Processes for Meteorological Models
Noilhan, J., & Planton, S. (1989) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1989)117<0536:aspols>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,166
Cited by
Keenan, T. F., & Williams, C. A. (2018) · Annual Review of Environment and Resources · doi:10.1146/annurev-environ-102017-030204 · Cited by 423
Drought timing and local climate determine the sensitivity of eastern temperate forests to drought
D'Orangeville, L., Maxwell, J., Kneeshaw, D., Pederson, N., Duchesne, L., Logan, T., Houle, D., Arseneault, D., Beier, C. M., Bishop, D. A., et al. (2018) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/gcb.14096 · Cited by 267
Metadata
- Authors
- Prentice, I. C., Liang, X., Medlyn, B. E., & Wang, Y.-P.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2015-05-29
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 5987-6005
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W1972132876
- Cited by
- 253
- References
- 148
- FWCI
- 11.15
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-15-5987-2015
- The paper
- Prentice, I. C., Liang, X., Medlyn, B. E., & Wang, Y.-P. (2015). Reliable, robust and realistic: the three R's of next-generation land-surface modelling. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-15-5987-2015
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.