Model calculations of the effects of present and future emissions of air pollutants from shipping in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract. Land-based emissions of air pollutants in Europe have steadily decreased over the past two decades, and this decrease is expected to continue. Within the same time span emissions from shipping have increased in EU ports and in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea, defined as SECAs (sulfur emission control areas), although recently sulfur emissions, and subsequently particle emissions, have decreased. The maximum allowed sulfur content in marine fuels in EU ports is now 0.1%, as required by the European Union sulfur directive. In the SECAs the maximum fuel content of sulfur is currently 1% (the global average is about 2.4%). This will be reduced to 0.1% from 2015, following the new International Maritime Organization (IMO) rules. In order to assess the effects of ship emissions in and around the Baltic Sea and the North Sea, regional model calculations with the EMEP air pollution model have been made on a 1/4° longitude × 1/8° latitude resolution, using ship emissions in the Baltic Sea and the North Sea that are based on accurate ship positioning data. The effects on depositions and air pollution and the resulting number of years of life lost (YOLLs) have been calculated by comparing model calculations with and without ship emissions in the two sea areas. In 2010 stricter regulations for sulfur emissions were implemented in the two sea areas, reducing the maximum sulfur content allowed in marine fuels from 1.5 to 1%. In addition ships were required to use fuels with 0.1 % sulfur in EU harbours. The calculations have been made with emissions representative of 2009 and 2011, i.e. before and after the implementation of the stricter controls on sulfur emissions from 2010. The calculations with present emissions show that per person, an additional 0.1–0.2 years of life lost is estimated in areas close to the major ship tracks with current emission levels. Comparisons of model calculations with emissions before and after the implementation of stricter emission control on sulfur show a general decrease in calculated particle concentration. At the same time, however, an increase in ship activity has resulted in higher emissions of other components, and subsequently air concentrations, in particular of NOx, especially in and around several major ports. Additional model calculations have been made with land-based and ship emissions representative of year 2030. Following a decrease in emissions from all sectors, air quality is expected to improve, and depositions to be reduced. Particles from shipping are expected to decrease as a result of emission controls in the SECAs. Further controls of NOx emissions from shipping are not decided, and calculations are presented with and without such controls.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Studies predict modest increases in PM2.5 of 5%-10% due to present-day shipping along the southern Norwegian coast.
“Modest increases in PM2.5 are predicted in studies focusing on European ship emissions with 5% -10% enhancements due to present-day shipping along the southern Norwegian coast (Aksoyoglu et al., 2016; Jonson et al., 2015).”
From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Jonson et al., 2015
Section 3.2 (p. 21953) reports that 2009 Baltic Sea and North Sea shipping contributed to modeled PM2.5 in nearby land areas, and Fig. 4 presents those contributions in percent. The text does not establish a 5%–10% PM2.5 increase specifically along the southern Norwegian coast; its approximately 10% figure refers instead to years of life lost in countries bordering the North Sea. (LLM, conf=0.86)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredSeveral studies have estimated the health impacts of emissions from shipping, solid fuel heating, and transportation among Arctic nations using similar extrapolations of epidemiologically derived concentration-response functions.
“Using similar extrapolations of epidemiologically derived concentration-response functions, several studies have estimated the health impacts of emissions from particular sources among Arctic nations, including shipping (Jonson et al., 2015), solid fuel heating (World Bank & ICCI, 2013.; Chafe et al., 2015; Sigsgaard et al., 2015), and transportation (Anenberg, Miller, et al., 2017; Crippa et”
From Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem (2018) · cites this paper as Jonson et al., 2015
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Transport impacts on atmosphere and climate: Metrics
Fuglestvedt, J. S., Shine, K. P., Berntsen, T., Cook, J., Lee, D. S., Stenke, A., Skeie, R. B., Velders, G. J. M., & Waitz, I. A. (2010) · Atmospheric Environment · doi:10.1016/j.atmosenv.2009.04.044 · Cited by 458 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- 10613-2012, 2012. 21948 · DOI
- Corbett, J., Winebrake, J., Green, E., Kasibhatla, P., and Eyring A. laurer, V.: Mortal- ity from ship emissions: a global assessment, Environ. Sci. Technol., 41, 8512-8518, doi:10.1021/es071686z, 2007. 21947 · DOI
- Endresen, Ø., Sørgård, E., Sundet, J., Dalsøren, S., Isaksen, I., Berglen, T., and Gravir, G.: Emission from international sea transport and environmental impact, J. Geophys. Res., 108, 4560, doi:10.1029/2002JD002898, 2003. 21947 · DOI
- Jonson, J. E., Stohl, A., Fiore, A. M., Hess, P., Szopa, S., Wild, O., Zeng, G., Dentener, F. J., Lupu, A., Schultz, M. G., Duncan, B. N., Sudo, K., Wind, P., Schulz, M., Marmer, E., Cu- velier, C., Keating, T., Zuber, A., Valdebenito, A., Dorokhov, V., De Backer, H., Davies, J., Chen, G. H., Johnson, B., Tarasick, D. W., Stübi, R., Newchurch, M.J., von der Gathen, P., Steinbrecht, W., and Claude, H.: A multi-model analysis of vertical ozone profiles, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 10, 5759-5783, doi:10.5194/acp-10-5759-2010, 2010. 21948 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Local Arctic Air Pollution: A Neglected but Serious Problem
Schmale, J., Arnold, S. R., Law, K. S., Thorp, T., Anenberg, S., Simpson, W. R., Mao, J., & Pratt, K. A. (2018) · Earth's Future · doi:10.1029/2018ef000952 · Cited by 219 · see citing works
“5 are predicted in studies focusing on European ship emissions with 5%–10% enhancements due to present-day shipping along the southern Norwegian coast (Aksoyoglu et al., 2016; Jonson et al., 2015).”
BackgroundContribution of ship emissions to the concentration and deposition of air pollutants in Europe
Aksoyoglu, S., Baltensperger, U., & Prévôt, A. S. H. (2016) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-1895-2016 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
- Authors
- Jonson, J. E., Jalkanen, J. P., Johansson, L., Gauss, M., & Denier van der Gon, H. A. C.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian Meteorological Institute (NO)
- Finnish Meteorological Institute (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Jalkanen, J. P.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2015-01-22
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 783-798
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2105827218
- Cited by
- 123
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3
- FWCI
- 7.44
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Atmospheric chemistry and physics (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- TNO Repository (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Repository hosted by TU Delft Library (TU Delft) (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- European Commission (243406)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Maritime Transport Emissions and Efficiency
- Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Atmospheric Science › Atmospheric chemistry and aerosols
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Pollution › Environmental Policies and Emissions
- Keywords
- ship emissions, maritime air pollution, Baltic Sea, North Sea, EMEP model, deposition, years of life lost, particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, air quality projections, port emissions, ship track, emission control scenarios, air pollution health effects
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review