The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. The microphysical and radiative properties of cirrus clouds continue to be beyond understanding and thus still represent one of the largest uncertainties in the prediction of the Earth's climate (IPCC, 2013). Our study aims to provide a guide to cirrus microphysics, which is compiled from an extensive set of model simulations, covering the broad range of atmospheric conditions for cirrus formation and evolution. The model results are portrayed in the same parameter space as field measurements, i.e., in the Ice Water Content-Temperature (IWC-T) parameter space. We validate this cirrus analysis approach by evaluating cirrus data sets from 17 aircraft campaigns, conducted in the last 15 years, spending about 94 h in cirrus over Europe, Australia, Brazil as well as South and North America. Altogether, the approach of this study is to track cirrus IWC development with temperature by means of model simulations, compare with observations and then assign, to a certain degree, cirrus microphysics to the observations. Indeed, the field observations show characteristics expected from the simulated Cirrus Guide. For example, high (low) IWCs are found together with high (low) ice crystal concentrations Nice. An important finding from our study is the classification of two types of cirrus with differing formation mechanisms and microphysical properties: the first cirrus type forms directly as ice (in situ origin cirrus) and splits in two subclasses, depending on the prevailing strength of the updraft: in slow updrafts these cirrus are rather thin with lower IWCs, while in fast updrafts thicker cirrus with higher IWCs can form. The second type consists predominantly of thick cirrus originating from mixed phase clouds (i.e., via freezing of liquid droplets – liquid origin cirrus), which are completely glaciated while lifting to the cirrus formation temperature region (< 235 K). In the European field campaigns, slow updraft in situ origin cirrus occur frequently in low- and high-pressure systems, while fast updraft in situ cirrus appear in conjunction with jet streams or gravity waves. Also, liquid origin cirrus mostly related to warm conveyor belts are found. In the US and tropical campaigns, thick liquid origin cirrus which are formed in large convective systems are detected more frequently.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Water activity as the determinant for homogeneous ice nucleation in aqueous solutions
Koop, T., Luo, B., Tsias, A., & Peter, T. (2000) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35020537 · Cited by 1,495
Review of the vapour pressures of ice and supercooled water for atmospheric applications
Murphy, D. M., & Koop, T. (2005) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1256/qj.04.94 · Cited by 1,430
(2014) · Climate Change 2013 – The Physical Science Basis · doi:10.1017/cbo9781107415324.016 · Cited by 1,423
Hoose, C., & Möhler, O. (2012) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-12-9817-2012 · Cited by 1,227
Clarifying the Dominant Sources and Mechanisms of Cirrus Cloud Formation
Cziczo, D. J., Froyd, K. D., Hoose, C., Jensen, E. J., Diao, M., Zondlo, M. A., Smith, J. B., Twohy, C. H., & Murphy, D. M. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1234145 · Cited by 649
Self-citationSassen, K., Wang, Z., & Liu, D. (2008) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2008jd009972 · Cited by 600
Measurements of the concentration and composition of nuclei for cirrus formation
DeMott, P. J., Cziczo, D. J., Prenni, A. J., Murphy, D. M., Kreidenweis, S. M., Thomson, D. S., Borys, R., & Rogers, D. C. (2003) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2532677100 · Cited by 568
Lawson, R. P., O’Connor, D., Zmarzly, P., Weaver, K., Baker, B., Mo, Q., & Jonsson, H. (2006) · Journal of Atmospheric and Oceanic Technology · doi:10.1175/jtech1927.1 · Cited by 461
Gettelman, A., Liu, X., Ghan, S. J., Morrison, H., Park, S., Conley, A. J., Klein, S. A., Boyle, J., Mitchell, D. L., & Li, J. ‐. F. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009jd013797 · Cited by 448
A parameterization of cirrus cloud formation: Homogeneous freezing of supercooled aerosols
Kärcher, B., & Lohmann, U. (2002) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2001jd000470 · Cited by 348
Cited by
Bounding Global Aerosol Radiative Forcing of Climate Change
Bellouin, N., Quaas, J., Gryspeerdt, E., Kinne, S., Stier, P., Watson‐Parris, D., Boucher, O., Carslaw, K. S., Christensen, M., Daniau, A. ‐., et al. (2020) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2019rg000660 · Cited by 1,116
“…of this effect is1300 small because the primary control on the homogeneous nucleation rate is the in-cloud1301 updraft (DeMott et al., 1997; Lohmann & Kärcher, 2002; Kay & Wood, 2008; Jensen1302 et al., 2013, 2016; Krämer et al., 2016).1303 Some aerosol types are effective heterogeneous INPs.”
BackgroundVoigt, C., Schumann, U., Minikin, A., Abdelmonem, A., Afchine, A., Borrmann, S., Boettcher, M., Buchholz, B., Bugliaro, L., Costa, A., et al. (2017) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-15-00213.1 · Cited by 266
Self-citationWhy cirrus cloud seeding cannot substantially cool the planet
Gasparini, B., & Lohmann, U. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1002/2015jd024666 · Cited by 146
Anthropogenic aerosol indirect effects in cirrus clouds
Penner, J. E., Zhou, C., Garnier, A., & Mitchell, D. L. (2018) · Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2018jd029204 · Cited by 94
Tully, C., Neubauer, D., Omanovic, N., & Lohmann, U. (2022) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-22-11455-2022 · Cited by 26
Metadata
- Authors
- Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., & Avallone, L.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2016-03-16
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 3463-3483
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2128182792
- Cited by
- 294
- References
- 45
- FWCI
- 15.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016
- The paper
- Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., Buchholz, B., Ebert, V., Baumgardner, D., Borrmann, S., Klingebiel, M., & Avallone, L. (2016). A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.