The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Global distribution of cirrus clouds from CloudSat/Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) measurements
Open accessAbstract
The cirrus clouds of the upper troposphere are globally widespread and are important regulators of the radiative balance, and hence climate, of the Earth‐atmosphere system. Despite their wide distribution, however, cirrus are difficult to study from satellite radiance measurements or from scattered ground observing sites because they can occur as part of multilayered cloud systems and are characteristically optically thin. The need to better characterize the global distribution of cirrus clouds was therefore a major justification for the formation flying of the CloudSat and CALIPSO satellites, which support a cloud radar and polarization lidar, respectively. Measurements by these active remote sensors, when analyzed by appropriate algorithms, have the ability to identify and accurately measure the locations and heights of this category of clouds. The combined CloudSat/Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) data cirrus cloud algorithm used in this study is aimed at identifying those clouds that would likely be classified as cirrus by a surface weather observer: it is based on previous experience with multiple remote sensor approaches and knowledge gleaned from extensive surface lidar and radar observations of visually identified cirrus clouds with a minimum of a priori assumptions. We report on the global and seasonal frequencies of cirrus clouds, and on their heights and thicknesses obtained over the initial 1 year of data collected. We find a global average frequency of cirrus cloud occurrence of 16.7%. These new results are compared with other cirrus cloud climatologies and are interpreted in terms of local cirrus cloud formation mechanisms and the responsible global weather phenomena.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation
Pruppacher, H. R., & Klett, J. D. (1978) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-94-009-9905-3 · Cited by 3,975
Microphysics of Clouds and Precipitation
Pruppacher, H. R., Klett, J. D., & Wang, P. K. (1998) · Aerosol Science and Technology · doi:10.1080/02786829808965531 · Cited by 2,827
Advances in Understanding Clouds from ISCCP
Rossow, W. B., & Schiffer, R. A. (1999) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/1520-0477(1999)080<2261:aiucfi>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 2,256
Stephens, G. L., Vane, D. G., Boain, R. J., Mace, G. G., Sassen, K., Wang, Z., Illingworth, A. J., O'connor, E. J., Rossow, W. B., Durden, S. L., et al. (2002) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-83-12-1771 · Cited by 2,100
Self-citationInitial performance assessment of CALIOP
Winker, D. M., Hunt, W. H., & McGill, M. J. (2007) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2007gl030135 · Cited by 1,395
Influence of Cirrus Clouds on Weather and Climate Processes: A Global Perspective
Liou, K.-N. (1986) · Monthly Weather Review · doi:10.1175/1520-0493(1986)114<1167:ioccow>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 1,070
The Effect of Cloud Type on Earth's Energy Balance: Global Analysis
Hartmann, D. L., Ockert-Bell, M. E., & Michelsen, M. L. (1992) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(1992)005<1281:teocto>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 783
Classifying clouds around the globe with the CloudSat radar: 1‐year of results
Sassen, K., & Wang, Z. (2008) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2007gl032591 · Cited by 356
Self-citationCloud Type and Macrophysical Property Retrieval Using Multiple Remote Sensors
Wang, Z., & Sassen, K. (2001) · Journal of Applied Meteorology · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2001)040<1665:ctampr>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 287
Self-citationCloud Vertical Structure and Its Variations from a 20-Yr Global Rawinsonde Dataset
Wang, J., Rossow, W. B., & Zhang, Y. (2000) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/1520-0442(2000)013<3041:cvsaiv>2.0.co;2 · Cited by 202
Cited by
A microphysics guide to cirrus clouds – Part 1: Cirrus types
Krämer, M., Rolf, C., Luebke, A., Afchine, A., Spelten, N., Costa, A., Meyer, J., Zöger, M., Smith, J., Herman, R. L., et al. (2016) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-16-3463-2016 · Cited by 294
Studying geoengineering with natural and anthropogenic analogs
Robock, A., MacMartin, D. G., Duren, R., & Christensen, M. W. (2013) · Climatic Change · doi:10.1007/s10584-013-0777-5 · Cited by 103
Aviation effects on already-existing cirrus clouds
Tesche, M., Achtert, P., Glantz, P., & Noone, K. J. (2016) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms12016 · Cited by 82
Can thin cirrus clouds in the tropics provide a solution to the faint young Sun paradox?
Rondanelli, R., & Lindzen, R. S. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres · doi:10.1029/2009jd012050 · Cited by 34
Metadata
- Authors
- Sassen, K., Wang, Z., & Liu, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
- Publisher
- American Geophysical Union (AGU)
- Published
- 2008-04-27
- Volume
- 113
- Issue
- D8
- ISSN
- 0148-0227 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013428977
- Cited by
- 600
- References
- 19
- FWCI
- 15.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Global distribution of cirrus clouds from CloudSat/Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) measurements. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1029/2008jd009972
- The paper
- Sassen, K., Wang, Z., & Liu, D. (2008). Global distribution of cirrus clouds from CloudSat/Cloud‐Aerosol Lidar and Infrared Pathfinder Satellite Observations (CALIPSO) measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008jd009972
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.