The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Organic acids as cloud condensation nuclei: Laboratory studies of highly soluble and insoluble species
Open accessAbstract
Abstract. The ability of sub-micron-sized organic acid particles to act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN) has been examined at room temperature using a newly constructed continuous-flow, thermal-gradient diffusion chamber (TGDC). The organic acids studied were: oxalic, malonic, glutaric, oleic and stearic. The CCN properties of the highly soluble acids - oxalic, malonic and glutaric - match very closely Köhler theory predictions which assume full dissolution of the dry particle and a surface tension of the growing droplet equal to that of water. In particular, for supersaturations between 0.3 and 0.6, agreement between the dry particle diameter which gives 50% activation and that calculated from Köhler theory is to within 3nm on average. In the course of the experiments, considerable instability of glutaric acid particles was observed as a function of time and there is evidence that they fragment to some degree to smaller particles. Stearic acid and oleic acid, which are both highly insoluble in water, did not activate at supersaturations of 0.6% with dry diameters up to 140nm. Finally, to validate the performance of the TGDC, we present results for the activation of ammonium sulfate particles that demonstrate good agreement with Köhler theory if solution non-ideality is considered. Our findings support earlier studies in the literature that showed highly soluble organics to be CCN active but insoluble species to be largely inactive.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Murphy, D. M., Thomson, D. S., & Mahoney, M. J. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.282.5394.1664 · Cited by 571
Cited by
An interfacial mechanism for cloud droplet formation on organic aerosols
Ruehl, C. R., Davies, J. F., & Wilson, K. R. (2016) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aad4889 · Cited by 308
A review of the anthropogenic influence on biogenic secondary organic aerosol
Hoyle, C. R., Boy, M., Donahue, N. M., Fry, J. L., Glasius, M., Guenther, A., Hallar, A. G., Huff Hartz, K., Petters, M. D., Petäjä, T., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-321-2011 · Cited by 306
Relative humidity in droplet and airborne transmission of disease
Božič, A., & Kanduč, M. (2021) · Journal of Biological Physics · doi:10.1007/s10867-020-09562-5 · Cited by 142
Petzold, A., Gysel, M., Vancassel, X., Hitzenberger, R., Puxbaum, H., Vrochticky, S., Weingartner, E., Baltensperger, U., & Mirabel, P. (2005) · Atmospheric chemistry and physics · doi:10.5194/acp-5-3187-2005 · Cited by 100
Metadata
- Authors
- Pradeep Kumar, P., Broekhuizen, K., & Abbatt, J. P. D.
- Venue
- Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics
- Publisher
- Copernicus GmbH
- Published
- 2003-05-19
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 509-520
- ISSN
- 1680-7316 (ISSN-L)
- 1680-7324
- OpenAlex
- W2124992912
- Cited by
- 177
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Organic acids as cloud condensation nuclei: Laboratory studies of highly soluble and insoluble species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.5194/acp-3-509-2003
- The paper
- Pradeep Kumar, P., Broekhuizen, K., & Abbatt, J. P. D. (2003). Organic acids as cloud condensation nuclei: Laboratory studies of highly soluble and insoluble species. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-3-509-2003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.